public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: djc@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The Python problem
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:31:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110627213141.7eb6036b@pomiocik.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimYEeG-S8+PrTary2=iH6TCwr5UOA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:28:34 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@gentoo.org> wrote:

> So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to
> know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the
> Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a
> number of other issues?

Working targets. USE_PYTHON is junk. What python.eclass does now with
ABIs is a PITA, and requires manually providing a lot of redudant
information (namely, RESTRICT_PYTHON_ABIS).

Right now, each ebuild has to provide the same information in
PYTHON_DEPEND and RESTRICT_PYTHON_ABIS. Moreover, if an ebuild
supports, say, py3 and its dependency doesn't, the ebuild has to
restrict py3 too.

I'd like to see that fixed somehow. I'd like to set a single supported
Python version information in an ebuild, and let the dependency
resolver handle everything else.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-27 12:28 [gentoo-dev] The Python problem Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-27 12:56 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-06-27 12:57 ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2011-06-27 13:08 ` Fabian Groffen
2011-06-27 13:43   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-27 20:49     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-28  6:54       ` Joshua Saddler
2011-06-28  7:19         ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-28 11:48           ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2011-06-28 11:53             ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-27 20:57     ` Thomas Sachau
2011-06-29 12:43       ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2011-06-27 15:53 ` Petteri Räty
2011-06-27 16:00   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-27 20:46     ` Petteri Räty
2011-06-28  8:06       ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-28  8:15         ` [gentoo-dev] REMOVE Stelios Boulios
2011-06-27 20:52     ` [gentoo-dev] The Python problem Mike Frysinger
2011-06-27 21:01       ` Hans de Graaff
2011-06-27 18:23 ` Benedikt Böhm
2011-06-28  8:02   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-27 19:31 ` Michał Górny [this message]
2011-06-28  8:04   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-06-28  8:21     ` Michał Górny
2011-06-29  0:33 ` Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
2011-06-29  4:34   ` Michał Górny
2011-06-29  7:18     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-06-29 10:16       ` Pacho Ramos
2011-06-29 12:19   ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110627213141.7eb6036b@pomiocik.lan \
    --to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    --cc=djc@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox