From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QakuE-0005wu-Tu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:41:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B94661C08D; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1261C082 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-255-13-150.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.13.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BC4E2AC015; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:41:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? Message-ID: <20110626104124.77ed12d9@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110626080257.12d523ef@googlemail.com> References: <20110626080257.12d523ef@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/UGHKD1JwGRlJt53JmW1bJD+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 116072542a7c56d9f89f790367a64c04 --Sig_/UGHKD1JwGRlJt53JmW1bJD+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:02:57 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > First, standardise sets. We probably want to go with a format along > the lines of: >=20 > eapi =3D 4 > description =3D Monkeys A 'type' field would be useful as well, to support various kinds of package sets (much like portage handles currently). > dev-monkey/howler > dev-monkey/spider > >=3Ddev-monkey/spanky-2.0 > dev-monkey/squirrel We'd either want to add || ( ) here, or somehow explicitly specify that this is a one-of set. > Second, make a bunch of sets named kde-tag, editors-tag, xml-tag, > monkeys-tag etc. I'd go with prefix, not suffix. Should be easier group them together then. > Disadvantages: doesn't use some horribly convoluted system of XML, > wikis and web 2.0. And introduces another dedicated file format the PM has to implement from scratch. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/UGHKD1JwGRlJt53JmW1bJD+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk4G8LkACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0R5gP+Kkcjm3o/sOqL97fCvon8oCZA ewxscd3690olihFPNIy8FDq9YJBx1NYDQQpY8Nl9GJqNUFgs4In5zZ1yjEvYHrSo bkUSbvuRxrsKFH1r94IGycPiGUcmk5UXao2KF0BUotGWtvvNA0LeRyF7fe79QFbD tmVjT54uWuDpCuRWSJ0= =ZrKo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UGHKD1JwGRlJt53JmW1bJD+--