From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QalG2-00021a-8H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:03:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A2F61C116; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C661C01E for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so3459614wwf.10 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=gloXI1MpYB4uexdxpd+E2ZoGT1alpHOhmL8NhYtrT4c=; b=q6FbYmjrmxNcvqybAKMMgi7FHnQpQ0eh6OmtNjLVWQbecJerNTuFv8BQSL9QJ10MSD Tg1PrfqvHRExkWXD/k/ZYLM88nnGdWPT+2JxewBep+u2k4uQO86HvNpTe/lktVnMpSRE XwvKD7Bqfg9KFLletmFpuTd6exTpf4qislyqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=upGSyRnwI/Wlkzdb84dmccXJWKVMciRwlL9XjdjysUw6yQ9sxZvLoxDqZkNkO6SjAx yfNOPFgauU4UTOG0F4VR48oV2kH9oAqB09aVi1uFZ7ORn5teOIg7qKX8wZAnl+Cd2pyg Ij/WjoOIeLSy7NV/wIMpIGu7+58cqwLYXdw/I= Received: by 10.216.61.145 with SMTP id w17mr1289578wec.59.1309078996369; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo4-0-0-cust780.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.215.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h22sm2189705wes.32.2011.06.26.02.03.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:00:43 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Are tags just sets? Message-ID: <20110626100043.034dd91a@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110626105444.366222bf@pomiocik.lan> References: <20110626080257.12d523ef@googlemail.com> <20110626104124.77ed12d9@pomiocik.lan> <20110626094341.30e1f043@googlemail.com> <20110626105444.366222bf@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/AyFqIT6nZ8EhmTYeXRqPLWR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 90c0b73d9b238b336231b73e4534729e --Sig_/AyFqIT6nZ8EhmTYeXRqPLWR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:54:44 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > I'm highly doubtful that there's any real need for different kinds > > of repository-provided sets. We especially don't want sets to be > > code... >=20 > Simple things like getting a list of packages which own a particular > file (for rebuilds) or grepping a variable are useful to users. That's something done by sets as provided by the package mangler, not something done by repository-specified sets. > For example, the x11 overlay provides a set to rebuild the xorg server > modules after an update. That's just a list of package specs. The user then says "only the ones of these that I have installed" by the way the set is used. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/AyFqIT6nZ8EhmTYeXRqPLWR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4G9T4ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHR0QCbBqE9v7y58O8Oo0MQFs2Y14V4 oJwAni3V/VU4aEd/3GOVd3sI5ZgAeVlk =vsBB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/AyFqIT6nZ8EhmTYeXRqPLWR--