From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QUOtV-0003Fg-EL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:58:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C63D21C0F8; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999681C12A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035611B401F for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:57:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:57:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4DEEF05E.9010306@gmail.com> <201106081304.09105.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201106081304.09105.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart108991757.TNAav26XGj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106081557.30732.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8d2bbd640e3822411e61c01684c96cb1 --nextPart108991757.TNAav26XGj Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 13:04:08 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 23:45:34 Dale wrote: > > So, council says it has to be done. You say you won't. Tell me where I > > missed the point here. >=20 > you missed the point as soon as you incorrectly stated that i said i wont. > thus the rest of your e-mail is useless noise. sorry, this was probably overly dismissive. let's rephrase to something li= ke=20 "the long e-mails were redundant/rhetorical and incorrectly attempted to ap= ply=20 to me". =2Dmike --nextPart108991757.TNAav26XGj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJN79QqAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBvi4P/RC6JFS9/URMeBq9d1JYToC2 kO8Py5gqKhpwycBP0B/sSD+mri0DyFrjcQqTDp+s62QgP9J10YtKqIRKT3QxboA0 4WRzTCxSA6Qp+wR9MeNk3Nm9zsfe8fTILYmViEJ9YFYewXSoFSybUPGKOx3ak3Ov 7czPSzuA3tnmxjakbeUOmWWEg0CrTGgKZMfAx4hMvreMt83Uk+lp3fl0HX89Voja YMGnen+VxxDfUJ51CaIpLCsRtWQx8q7fPyh2AU3pF1SlY1xjfxuOEnAnA4c+kMxI HZXQ7LObkKkn49GxCm1ZIKynD/71GPqSPu8p4Z5Z/2kAjAp+fY/32igK/5w0VCRv hyqt+xIsgqyxaMogRMZsbh4XSc1icT/2wqNeZ2WJcJQpyDyeCe2WtAYUJg3rY5w+ HNWYDhCBWmDsSdCh1vjtgRCFrRvC/bgdqaUcBugCHm+5uRg6Pz22r7vBzjFV7ERs 4eesjjlGBhmyHjJqzDxx/QjCcyFZ3E8+3R69asMdZi7IJIX+8eT978COx9Qz7aUm hBjyVDYcl0WCT0ssZ2iQ2FB20Riy7rwtvbnWNyokPtgbVsw0oPehZAR2yq1wrrvO 1jKW/JigBoCLYtd8SuA+zR+ejZw/ZtNeKIx2zKzov69PXIVVsK1qd0vIYLwDtKT2 ZlisqNhffhaTuFuphgb4 =iN1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart108991757.TNAav26XGj--