From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QUM8Y-00012Y-NS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:01:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 079E31C0B1; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B791C035 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABE21B401A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:01:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:01:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201106071745.04418.vapier@gentoo.org> <20110608054449.3dd2a49f@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110608054449.3dd2a49f@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3785504.Nzk8Bd4bJ6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106081301.05157.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 0c45d6c30dc17e46fd410d2eb46c988a --nextPart3785504.Nzk8Bd4bJ6 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 23:44:49 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:45:03 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:36:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the > > > > > current situation. > > > >=20 > > > > of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant. > > >=20 > > > Does this mean we should shortly be expecting to see you do the > > > work to migrate the tree to Git and to automate ChangeLog > > > generation? > >=20 > > the tree has already been migrated. automatic ChangeLog generation > > is trivial to implement, and many many projects already have scripts > > to do it. >=20 > Including portage's egencache which can generate ChangeLogs from git. > Just a side note. very cool ... wasnt aware of that guy, thanks =2Dmike --nextPart3785504.Nzk8Bd4bJ6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJN76rRAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBwd4QANZLArk7jrDa7JxxXr9q8sR/ /7xDjHxbOKDTDL3adDzjAPHJvhIGdFUVEUjarlonGO/kfUBMXF+wgSK9aXeW6ZOf b0hTIKCpL8RRXHt0LUglNC0OIv8OCryLh7ExwV1Spct7+3Qf9b5LFVHiko86PTmX sW2mgy6u33obdePv0PNXEt1ctB1NgkgoLunxBsTvjx17h41SCVBQ9mBypNwfLkyC B8jriw8ll3JqC2szUYFZy4XGdtcFLD/YecqM1z0TmYphEzp8ZAdJa4m6OSZcz1+M VxU0xiWuXxKE9t/HLJPuH+ft8JXpAKEIZ+31trn1aoUZD9SPTHzp5/GcC+NdRxYE IvX6ORG3VSq725C3ffARrAnsDnjXjX/93L38YtMHNoE39zgmYmdgRaTus298AM4x oz1m21ZCUvNajFiP+DzJpVy2us5SIpXpDKz2LuedbAZGEmY5xFUpB2d71pGEkyax v3NWR9oEmUmZadY+ysDkmivnj3Z6cRCHRMiHlKpuVwmvfP0CopvPmmHMtkI5Behs Xbba6KLKWUR9xKPTABdp20d/Pbh+/iHghVxnndwEczF6iALCDE4SvKXPlyabWpKN 5FDUomNzF6FDc2rMrUTnn5CKZBooUVXhklRQnNIkz3OifIY8tSpnjvItGBvYVucE 9jf/qejsY5E27uqwyw89 =tPPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3785504.Nzk8Bd4bJ6--