From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU9hs-00057K-KX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:45:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE2E31C03D; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4B41C008 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-62-108.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.62.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 949D21B401A; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:44:49 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: vapier@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Message-ID: <20110608054449.3dd2a49f@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <201106071745.04418.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201106071735.12118.vapier@gentoo.org> <20110607223659.29fd1c3e@googlemail.com> <201106071745.04418.vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/Tj7HVvqbOsSvECRUy31kCcB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 1a4aec9d227b164d99a38da3edd7d0c1 --Sig_/Tj7HVvqbOsSvECRUy31kCcB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:45:03 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:36:59 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the > > > > current situation. > > >=20 > > > of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant. > >=20 > > Does this mean we should shortly be expecting to see you do the > > work to migrate the tree to Git and to automate ChangeLog > > generation? >=20 > the tree has already been migrated. automatic ChangeLog generation > is trivial to implement, and many many projects already have scripts > to do it. Including portage's egencache which can generate ChangeLogs from git. Just a side note. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/Tj7HVvqbOsSvECRUy31kCcB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk3u8DoACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3alAP/S1iaZR9WDyFDhDIMysv8h85F /XlA00GsphkG0Q/LEFvs/CfKc15Aqh7ILxe0l87xsZlo1FBUMMSTMOnA6AQzb+jC e2/qCy/egH2CFo7PTBiiJJDED/uPp6Cu2ycYcEuzYOabJOIGl40Rlr9/u0SD//Ge cCYnbbA6LOUPFsNZL58= =9/Ms -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Tj7HVvqbOsSvECRUy31kCcB--