From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU3cE-0003Zk-UI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:15:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7074C1C182; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BBF1C160 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:14:12 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy/54wX4oRGP6NKj4cDg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet ([81.27.171.130]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo52) (RZmta 25.18) with ESMTPA id B069a2n57JLD1Y for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:14:12 +0200 (MEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:14:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201106071553.27793.vapier@gentoo.org> <4DEE8E61.7010109@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4DEE8E61.7010109@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1433432.sWKu1tEtOp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106072314.13395.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 215384b2571a63ba143f807c53dcc1a3 --nextPart1433432.sWKu1tEtOp Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On 06/07/11 15:53, Mike Frysinger wrote: (...) > > waste of time. i simply wont bother removing old versions until > > changelogs start being autogenerated or the policy is sane again. =46or the record, I support Dane's statement 100%.=20 In addition, I would like to say that you're behaving pretty much childish = and=20 obstructive. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart1433432.sWKu1tEtOp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3ulKUACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWrMOwCfenAwBL4O3hSAuSWUC0jklqA6 EwoAn27+f9Git7fO00YYo7woIOMAkjJ5 =Cva6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1433432.sWKu1tEtOp--