From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU9Ae-0000il-8U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:11:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 185471C073; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1AE1C069 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE971B401A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:10:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: include dbus session handling in baselayout (or somewhere, in which case where?) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:10:16 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4DBC36BF.8050208@kraav.com> <201106071811.21358.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart52328274.7TrjWx9NVm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106072310.17515.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 210fb9c2f1f0e6e1833b02f433dc5526 --nextPart52328274.7TrjWx9NVm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 22:02:23 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:20:15 Leho Kraav wrote: > >> /etc/profile.d/dbus-session.sh attached, looking for feedback about > >> problems with it and if the whole approach even makes sense. I might be > >> not knowing something important. > >=20 > > i dont think this makes sense in baselayout. it works great without > > dbus. > >=20 > > doesnt the login manager already take care of launching a dbus-session ? >=20 > I believe the use-case is being able to control applications from the > VTs without having to launch a dbus session manually. Which should be > done via ~/.bashrc, to be honest. Makes no sense to have a global dbus > session, since it's supposed to be per-user. i imagine this could be done via pam too i dont think this is a global dbus session. it's in profile.d which means = it=20 gets executed at shell login time. i think you meant .bash_login rather th= an=20 =2Ebashrc. probably the only place this could be integrated is in the dbus ebuild itse= lf. =20 install it as a doc file and elog the info to make the user aware of it. i= =20 don't think this is something we want to install automatically. =2Dmike --nextPart52328274.7TrjWx9NVm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJN7ugZAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBmgoP+gO8ZgqlhWuR6VWdPb25y8zJ pmbxxtdyMds5JBYNqc8gphueenecUcDvnczuDT3FFeavfyUSV1dGdUs6a3wRCE/7 QbtiA1UJI9xOmFMWkVIF+pHWPNXfnSZjA0AQgY+giwzxDd3rZ6lFhFnmnXuwYkKE 6sd4ejnBUEWLI/fTRB7O9r7fg8mXwi9m8KUUO7gHdQjZ/Ytz4RCYw1iwf/mFnjcr w6ovxroGgPdzlom+vRe/zw4REnqpHkae/AgoTOIhSwMxaOtf1vIXlcyER4t5NAZP HOL2//b/L4kp2HgnzKTvD8jeQJzUPUm/d5tQqUCG7xO6ZLOR1F78UwHosV96qTcv /qqghUbatfKGXyUjbT5tAQWB0tNHQ2bfT33LadJCCor/9/oCP56CHgcpR4p1U+I5 r+t87wiUXURl3cHetr9FOTDFQzO4Aj8DOxlSVpF5vSAckyEOvPwfJP39TYFdlC6A bUwFurg4RHnxkWtz7fkt/zkW5VdxStPqa33UXK0XlA+puvyST6XWb36z/U25z4qZ mPQX48CcWCkDBKLAQ3+Q7/lhOK7Ve5ASmitphqoR1w5gtPuQKsGEabEGFRRgDJ9d 2IxYQ+PzLEyg/qJieR2CFWM7o0mTnPjxGDBrqMIOjMKC+mkbC0zHxUVekioi5jtt LytR8GmDZ0hkfvMV1PQU =hawL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart52328274.7TrjWx9NVm--