From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU98l-0000Uo-Ol for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:09:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0155D1C03D; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E741C008 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7681B4005 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 03:08:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:08:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201106071824.52253.vapier@gentoo.org> <4DEEB720.3030806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DEEB720.3030806@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3083082.c35QQncL2b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106072308.19376.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b8b4fc6952f70baafc388459c37a5293 --nextPart3083082.c35QQncL2b Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 19:41:20 Dale wrote: > I have a question or two. I don't care if you, or others, reply to this > with a answer, just think on it. A policy, rule if you will, has been > decided on by the council. This after MUCH discussion on this list and > the council hearing both sides of the argument. You, apparently on your > own or with a few others, have decided to ignore the policy or rule. umm, no, ive done no such thing. try again. -mike --nextPart3083082.c35QQncL2b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJN7uejAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBVdYP/Rm1a6hY7RlPWWLyHVXyCGYn 2ailOhRnVHTk2Ul9UKtnVWePi/7XMrPGOmAVysj/yRU9ILkfR8mGASZTbGtUigZ2 AwHx4Qdz6WB+OkXbIsW90NulNfXN5tWIt4lvXnU0ar41tdDFzoms2RFVN+XBcUdg 2NDLY1H6uEHMCNnUYw+hC3fEP2xxYIPEsden2ndcILd8TwEXGeeM7zTuP4ShQqbn sGaDlIpx6BJO4eykTfRrEoJJunuqxnOeIU8DZABLmNJClvNy1ksGv6ad621mTNlI hCur94NQFP93CxTLwUMz0ybljN8V5mimj4A4Nv6DoAkYI1RhNt070NEYcwQtYMU9 JUwAE3qx3ZlWUse/WkEpMC2vafKvJJpFlwZQs2rGntC0jgoQ/aKw83h07EkGHah+ UroHaJ83DKIibee9MWVSLeU7dGeb8RUdruHngwu1OCe+Cdxn2R6l44+7mHAYIOq0 q3nR5XodEsaoqItzCr3bRyeepfTZtaDB7ca5qrnh2VRTyHIQQOD0Ng4jmh3QjsPL NjEWh0UGpeHnxLvysNJBmkWv0DOl4KNnizfi2lSvQ4m81rAEu4PmI5GqfGK0ifon ohsm1WMjrniG5M0tZjaDW/Y23biDftFGioz+eTop71N/aCSbJc+OdC8bPQOGeaCY wANMj3m/YaAh198sSspK =V7s7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3083082.c35QQncL2b--