From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU3w9-0005aq-U1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:35:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CF3E1C1AA; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2BB1C1A7 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869231B4033 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:35:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201106071709.34494.vapier@gentoo.org> <4DEE96CB.9090703@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4DEE96CB.9090703@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4999586.ojcM4EyzCg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106071735.12118.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9d138c3481b55e3fc77db367a7168bc8 --nextPart4999586.ojcM4EyzCg Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:23:23 Dane Smith wrote: > On 06/07/11 17:09, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 16:47:29 Dane Smith wrote: > >> To be perfectly blunt, no small part of what caused this current fiasco > >> was this exact attitude. I don't like the current policy either, it's > >> far too wide. However, if you go back and look at why it even *got* to > >> council, it was because you (and others), decided that they weren't > >> going to give any regard to the requests of some of their fellow devs > >> about ChangeLogging removals. > >=20 > > how is this relevant at all ? i dont find value in these entries, other > > people do. my attitude towards how worthless they are has 0 bearing on > > the policy towards creating it. >=20 > There never would have been any such policy had people been a little > considerate of the requests of others. This could have ended like so: sorry, but that's utter bs. there is a disconnect between what you find=20 valuable and what i find valuable. all you're doing is assuming your posit= ion=20 is right and mine is wrong and thus i'm in the wrong and thus any disagreem= ent=20 that causes strife after that is my fault. if common ground between=20 developers cannot be attained, then it is the council's job to step in and= =20 make a decision. > And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current > situation. of course it does. it makes the current situation irrelevant. =2Dmike --nextPart4999586.ojcM4EyzCg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJN7pmQAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBMLsQALYJu+wtHUZQJTMfjKMbDJoN K09wl4+e7M6AO+GFG3frWa5aJAlcsqhMiEBzf6i8oodiFQ39ZS++IrwdJBGX6Im6 MHbfc/igpQ7Wq/Vxt4DdydIGfi3vLWqccvAUqTbBwqFo6ExO/2ctgI0qx6AR1VFZ GhegWwEpYbNSteiP+vKp2OWYRpoQYyECSROdIOXutc730rB3vMKtFsVKrrC1X3sF Ednd0GpQHH+hpymG6z/jToJkXBg5pUZC2XS/Ai3oc/W3oUb9peBRMZcV0tdKYHGT mwxo5GdKJsshOAgUysXUiQqfYbt5IKArRLmenqUu5/rQrywch6fx09+lUKehabxo f5Gl4+TrzC4I814i7U1UdDgGs3Bn4C+1JBA2muNOB+oHKQnfkwsG5kSrNLLD4+M8 wnylgWkki3CdvfU+LGgvvknxMDZNdzHBRKDM0YibZKIMYKESUkOhWg3Z4fqNwHrH Rcr3F9FrRO6IcIDZn0TY6jcXnwCJFQCsjSA8z/kgqJOc+Ik5MahwVf9K1v4yblga Yq8go9jUfIW5SWDX5eoOS/tQGX4wKUCUqosmIco66+9VxKIkcoSVqD8rOKsQ1vva 9eeqxVYNqTQM1/BuEa1u7DiuUIILN/Dy+bJen/pf34PQbA6pjVdjSUPKfd6yBJR+ qk1KydqYY5ZN1duIiF4O =G/HV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4999586.ojcM4EyzCg--