From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QU3kn-0004U9-3M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:24:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A51561C182; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3AF1C153 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC8F1B403B for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:23:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:23:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4DEE8E61.7010109@gentoo.org> <201106072314.13395.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201106072314.13395.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2185730.ZyvviGGa6G"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106071723.22779.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3133d38798aecc97ff184a9ac1a67a3f --nextPart2185730.ZyvviGGa6G Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 17:14:05 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > On 06/07/11 15:53, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > waste of time. i simply wont bother removing old versions until > > > changelogs start being autogenerated or the policy is sane again. >=20 > For the record, I support Dane's statement 100%. >=20 > In addition, I would like to say that you're behaving pretty much childish > and obstructive. in no way whatsoever am i obstructing anyone. look up the word and try aga= in. as for childish, that's your opinion of course and everyone has one. here'= s=20 another: forcing useless information which can be automatically dumped is a= =20 waste of developer time. =2Dmike --nextPart2185730.ZyvviGGa6G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJN7pbKAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBrfYP/jAuFuSF6T9/EMJzTujnyxJ4 J+Q+F0W2ikRKIrjW9DqRd4zThYr0zwQD+TsMVXklQHxSn2VM5rcdvZoUySWtn8Li GeE8aDlVMsU8mxRYXryqYuanxdVAr4WFIphkMhKOhzIqFdXhDGUczdzHivWNgcHy MEhK5EWNKvlhnpYqO6X2dFfrnSu8cThr1eCaeSgi/VkGQddEBuHAjOUXW8tZ4F0g sqJ9nGIFHdeHMHSADziP8ApG5BQoebZuhFP1FjGULH9A1F/rTttkQgmI/EiDIihe foCbNM7EZuvSoySQ2nw+5f6j1rlvwUgUhUbb5d3+TLV0pe/nab03mA7BdDK7TPr1 0Rsb8CEPd+OAT/w09hH32tpu60DLSXfinMmdp8+qEcIpPqf3s8wyqJw9ysCgYpt0 fE31O63IHHisa3uWINje9lvU6Haqo3oFBQw/VB31Uz6xWkQ8RVjV4RFs1DICAboC AxCOeOLISOgQINQQBMyKXYWK3vq7+iZ3hVzIDLP1DXBeCq2gVTrmpCv05ZMHx7Xd Jr8Z8PSst5APaqet4/ZagVc2dHIRTaVsIq859X60jZBsu17IE5JJBXu9j/TRlIGp FFvP7cn9ZzTbFE5G+4jFpE2VED3/Fnp7C+NQLxXG+blZaXAORdvc0wu19zjO/c9j fCuqaJCbbnshTm6ALhWK =0+kb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2185730.ZyvviGGa6G--