From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QS6h3-0006pE-2G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:08:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7D181C0B8 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FCC1C09D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so701951wyi.40 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:12:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=+ibognxNjhDfHVk2phC3gbjXRL4a9+DIK/rxkDdum6k=; b=N10kuQCs2LxAoxllEUiIefInFW5VoJKbxbpixZVL59G+qCdgyT3TIh/1lui5VF5KfT ttXctjitC01f8M4zLtN09Ngf+5/lzWdPeWA8oykEmoK2jzkxUdzIlyCs3Bv5zfyEXiPn /ZUjwh0NT5nVf/hM2wy/UsKGPRlHfieAHoK+8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=qGoSGwVVKSVVNmHHVC8GcCi0V4thGVCm0ss0MC6Lz6gKgwZMeKk24YFYPDw+9udH9m xN2C7IYQv9gfkA3oyr7dquMbYis3mAwruryjcWXyey17JzkuB4pIA4rJucdcCV1c7Y42 uHmRafPXmyjjCDXT9yEnv8l7IBzpyl+cWAKb4= Received: by 10.216.143.88 with SMTP id k66mr2331128wej.15.1307013135721; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo4-0-0-cust780.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.215.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b10sm321856wbh.26.2011.06.02.04.12.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:10:20 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs Message-ID: <20110602121020.49a069ce@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4DD24EBE.5060002@gentoo.org> <201106011739.45691.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201106011824.06028.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <4DE6CB57.5080709@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/JPRyN=U_HbVwoWOjob6KnrB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: ded8d8fa3293025c15819b1b179d7a6a --Sig_/JPRyN=U_HbVwoWOjob6KnrB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:35:24 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > (c) has irked enough developers and users that people pushed > > council to update the policy about the use of ChangeLogs. >=20 > Yes, and I'm surprised that these same developers pushed towards a > negative solution (kick productive people out) rather than a positive > solution (move to git). Those developers have been pushing for a move to git for years. There comes a point where it becomes necessary to accept that the perfect solution is only the best solution if it will ever happen. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/JPRyN=U_HbVwoWOjob6KnrB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3nb58ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFlawCdFZYcuSYOCWkfRN++uaCBvLjM y7wAniVD1ZDF4vZ+F5qBSO0yYAeJqYgG =2Daz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JPRyN=U_HbVwoWOjob6KnrB--