From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAbG-00088j-Ov for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:06:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DFEA1C0B9; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3F21C01B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:05:35 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy/54wX4oRGP6NKj4cDg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet ([81.27.171.130]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo41) (RZmta 25.18) with ESMTPA id i0651dn4ULo4V8 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:05:09 +0200 (MEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Common sense in [gentoo-dev] (was Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:05:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <4DD24EBE.5060002@gentoo.org> <1306757022.9216.36.camel@tablet> <20110530215552.GA3908@hrair> In-Reply-To: <20110530215552.GA3908@hrair> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6543126.BZpinjUJSY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105310005.09218.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4508345094ebfbe868b3020c146b58f3 --nextPart6543126.BZpinjUJSY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Montag 30 Mai 2011, 23:55:52 schrieb Brian Harring: > If someone has a definition that is commonsense, then propose it- the > current "you must log everything" is very, very heavy handed and > basically was a forced situation since QA cannot make folks behave > when the rules are reliant on common sense. Well how about "any change that can influence the behaviour of (portage|you= r=20 favourite package manager) in any way or present the user with different=20 output"? Clearly rules out whitespace changes.=20 Small typos in text messages might be seen as a (harmless) borderline case.= =20 Removal of an ebuild definitely can influence portage behaviour, as can f.e= x.=20 an EAPI bump. Thoughts? =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart6543126.BZpinjUJSY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3kFJUACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWrR0QCglI72QrBXYiqNRXxEa6pQtlyf EsYAn2IWSRLLxorvwccC+Og4AzmgfBHK =YBMG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6543126.BZpinjUJSY--