From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QOXE2-0005ny-27 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:39:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39D031C06D; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rookery.halcy0n.com (rookery.halcy0n.com [69.72.242.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D16A1C09A for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rookery.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCDE5A5623; Mon, 23 May 2011 11:38:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:38:44 -0400 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of kdeprefix news item Message-ID: <20110523153844.GK12874@halcy0n.com> References: <3492806.SC9FXRJr6n@jonathan-laptop> <19924.49067.318264.52433@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <19924.50076.202838.866032@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5me2qT3T17SWzdxI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19924.50076.202838.866032@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 46538688b3faffb0b0035e6864dc2a5c --5me2qT3T17SWzdxI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ulrich Mueller said: > >>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alec Warner wrote: >=20 > > You should file a bug about that; I'm sure one of the portage guys > > can change the crap code I wrote 4 years ago to use the normal > > dependency checking code for installed atoms. >=20 > But we wouldn't know if users have the updated portage version > installed, so it doesn't help for the current news item. >=20 > I think for a proper solution we would have to increase the number of > the News-Item-Format. Maybe even add a new header field for the EAPI. This seems like the absolute easiest solution to use going forward. Having an 'eapi' file present seems workable as well, though I'm not certain which is the easiest for Portage to implement today. Are there any other suggestions, or does anyone disagree with Ulrich's suggestion? --=20 Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com --5me2qT3T17SWzdxI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFN2n+ECRZPokWLroQRAii+AJ90+ednlQoaTM6GshzgiMxyMlVnnwCgwiVR cB6c0VOXbR9EdhbdAuzamaQ= =zLg7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5me2qT3T17SWzdxI--