From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QNSyv-0002wk-PN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 16:55:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 004A81C015; Fri, 20 May 2011 16:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pima.mpagano.com (unknown [67.228.218.97]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE30E0444 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 16:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pima.mpagano.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE8654885E for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:54:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mpagano.com Received: from pima.mpagano.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pima.mpagano.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BY5tqSI1scUS for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from comanche.localnet (pool-96-234-75-192.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [96.234.75.192]) by pima.mpagano.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6EB1E5485E1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:54:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Pagano To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 12:54:27 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20110517165748.GA3266@linux1> <4DD62D24.4030306@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4DD62D24.4030306@gentoo.org> X-KMail-Markup: true Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_Ezp1N1josgE1rpt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105201254.28273.mpagano@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e1a8f7b9bf46c6bb7d00520712bdd576 --Boundary-01=_Ezp1N1josgE1rpt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote: > On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken > init replacement called systemd. > > lu Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual brokenness? --Boundary-01=_Ezp1N1josgE1rpt Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote:

> On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote:

> That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken

> init replacement called systemd.

>

> lu


Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual brokenness?



--Boundary-01=_Ezp1N1josgE1rpt--