On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken 
> init replacement called systemd.
> 
> lu

Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual brokenness?