From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QMQYg-0003CW-TN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:07:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EE421C25E; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F321C0F3 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (178-37-177-230.adsl.inetia.pl [178.37.177.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E2211B4010; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 22:07:27 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: tester@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory Message-ID: <20110517220727.7a23663f@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <1305662441.2645.1.camel@TesterTop4> References: <20110517165748.GA3266@linux1> <1305655899.18096.4.camel@tablet> <20110517192056.GA13002@Vereniki.lan> <1305662441.2645.1.camel@TesterTop4> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/3xl8vlc5cVkvoqnIM3fV0Ls"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 622366df8674547b14419401b8efb92a --Sig_/3xl8vlc5cVkvoqnIM3fV0Ls Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:00:41 -0400 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > Maybe you should use /var/tmp for that? Or ~/tmp/ ? > >=20 > > OTOH, we could use an rc.conf configuration variable to control > > whether /tmp is mounted as tmpfs. >=20 > Having /tmp and /var/tmp as tmpfs sounds like a terrible idea.. I > don't think we should facilitate it in any way. I always thought we're having two separate temporary directories because /tmp is for small data (i.e. suitable for tmpfs) while /var/tmp is for larger one. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/3xl8vlc5cVkvoqnIM3fV0Ls Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAk3S1X8ACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3YNAP9HgDcqus+CAqrl3ejp2RQEKBT bn4PIAVfEAGMC5MAep9Ts2GT3f9thDgZ9wutBMFwZrloU0asavUo3BJzFo/FUH96 tLzgzpOdJy2/QyrUxrJAJaoc5bL284sxz+W516gKfen7dEIGwdBJBnZisn2Kh01i SOAmsgTLmBsRlt+CTvo= =0sZR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3xl8vlc5cVkvoqnIM3fV0Ls--