From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QM3mk-0002AT-Eo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:48:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 080C41C0F5; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rookery.halcy0n.com (rookery.halcy0n.com [69.72.242.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93301C0E8 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 19:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rookery.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BA9BA562B; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:48:20 -0400 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild Message-ID: <20110516194820.GC11997@halcy0n.com> References: <20110516033002.207452004F@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20110516134108.GB11997@halcy0n.com> <4DD164CC.90905@gentoo.org> <4DD16AC1.7030903@gentoo.org> <20110516182415.GA28402@Eternity.halls.manchester.ac.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9d969df77e65d3e48be8899fe56990b2 --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alec Warner said: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras w= rote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Rier= a (klondike) wrote: > >> El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribi=C3=B3: > >> > Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which te= nd > >> > to quickly convert into the "witch hunt" and seldom lead to anything > >> > conclusive. > >> To some of us (i.e. me as a staffer and probably any wanna be developer > >> following the list) it is a good way to learn from others' mistake > >> before applying for full developership. > >> > > > > This may be a bit of surprise to you but this is not an educational > > list. If you people disagree with these kind of commits feel free to > > open a bug to QA/Devrel like the policy suggests. But pretty please > > try to break this non-sense loop of this and similar threads. >=20 > I actually value times when this stuff is CC'd to the list, is there > some other list you think folks should CC problems on? This is exactly where these sorts of emails should go so every other developer can see what's going on and ensure they are also following current policies. Don't make yet another list...that's just pointless. --=20 Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFN0X+ECRZPokWLroQRAtAqAKCN0qvJ/qJUN13gwONtt/AHyvF4SwCfWIq+ iNbGEbGgxuJdWf4+ANdXuKQ= =OqST -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa--