From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKpKy-0000CY-0w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:11:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BA7F1C04F; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61011C024 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so2400730wyi.40 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:10:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qxlkE3NRuXxKGlxm8s+0YnhkSxvcaLVlAUF7X1MfdAE=; b=duD2cw3/wppkKLnfBlpQrw5zx/jEmKEZL6jbTc4yhBV43dhQus5JlJt2c+MR2GyLKI rlg5rJ93REUTDC+BkbCOLcSH+2yn6+aclivX9zJ4pAmAdEPWX3evMsb20Jbn0PQyi6fx eq6NtUkkb7tcE/cC0CeAK0ajxdwJbC8ARHx4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=PeCsX7oJDBS9h+zVXHK3dfE4YgL49BoVRk98Lsg7VUgwfmQgU9NuYBG7EcT9C16eZS dpSFywCw8kaLpFXuS5qm1Q0STsw/W6B9UE8V/f5tGMa9aP0rsyAXZc/uxq0Pr33MhyU8 UV79j5T2CAMZfWdikXnJC+iCNkLyBwQxJidKs= Received: by 10.216.90.74 with SMTP id d52mr445169wef.25.1305281417790; Fri, 13 May 2011 03:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Eternity.halls.manchester.ac.uk (wh147a.halls.manchester.ac.uk [130.88.185.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g58sm1051791wen.20.2011.05.13.03.10.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 May 2011 03:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:10:10 +0100 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] More bugzilla restrictions should be applied to normal users Message-ID: <20110513101010.GA11219@Eternity.halls.manchester.ac.uk> References: <20110512201945.GA15917@Eternity.halls.manchester.ac.uk> <4DCC73E6.2040903@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DCC73E6.2040903@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 45f16d6defa4f9f717166050905ab493 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:57:26PM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Hi Markos. >=20 > On 12-05-2011 20:19, Markos Chandras wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Quite a lot of users tend to change bugzilla fields without even > > understand why they are doing it. Would it be possible to restrict users > > from touching the following fields? > >=20 > > - Importance > > - Severity > > - CCing arches on their own (!) > > - Blocks > > - Keywords > > - <...> > >=20 > > How do you feel about that? Does bugzilla allow such restrictions? >=20 > I think we should trust our users. Some might feel tempted to "test all > the buttons", but I'm sure the majority will just try to fill a bug > report the best way they know how. It is not a matter of trust. If you trust them, then blocking access to these fields shouldn't be a problem anyway. > This topic has been raised a few times in the past and as far as I can > recall there never was a consensus about it. In any case, as pointed out > before, some developers want users to be able to CC them on bugs, at > least on some bugs, informed users can have a good idea about the > importance and or severity of a bug and in general being more open can > provide a more inviting environment for users to look at and or > contribute to Gentoo. First of all, I said "Ccing Arches". Of course they should be allowed to CC anyone, but ccing arches creates too much noise for us and quite a lot of them do not understand the purpose of arch alias. > Finally, whenever a user abuses bugzilla, you can poke bugzilla admins, > userrel and a few others to look at and take care of it. Some of us can > go as far as locking users accounts - feel free to poke me if that need > ever arises. >=20 > > Regards, >=20 How is this solution more elegant than the one I proposed? :) Regards, --=20 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNzQOCAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCIioQAJG9I4lXuz10J6BA8FRzyuVw CNtm1Ty27wsaJ6DK4OUu3QgdquIHTy3P1X0SxNEkQkCDICmOKO0Xcli8NKe/VmbY bApWCeaNE/m9m1LF9ntCeEO/Rr9AxhfRXQcwEAsqs3SKs30gFBgQx+f02/C/0btO y9dih6USDf4VCqjBbyogZ07zVvZyRDk8nYndVLYjfYf7ugKA7En88Xa0WXeub92n PWADorAWGjrTim0bt1xzWpEaXpaoW/ZFcB3arTocJTY/Ax4j+uMyl697fnpltO4n Uc2CLs74lUIvK9Ha6Y8hmWkOwCcE5rt45oDErBYU2l8TMY+RPR/AA01HOo76HhMk 5bMnRgkIMFHhouAXskH2yeAsrRmd4w7Bkc+IwniBoFsLTwgLoT8A2ypAIBCmEO54 MsfRlFc1Opa45VQzIs8p/8M9hTnESCGldmP1j8NP38s34hxGK3Y1YaCK2SetFMc9 3crY0WyQX06kjHonVtsZqT01d1i7rmKSaHnyWPqW8mx6peFggE/NoySct1zETTs8 2poX3Q6WQrb6pCoFrsh16lb8WVctKbCgAwHOayXlIdwqfxilPMw6WGYnoPUM7Mdq kOeDHq1UDN8tLFIhcXhVkZhiuAKfM1mHd9T2JBwHfGNnaaeQnouJwbDo+4GzWda1 5xSAUdaE1hbqtrn9za5E =DVYq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--