From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QHcaP-000838-6A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:57:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C06D91C044; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8039F1C003 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1028461fxm.40 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QmC3QECQmj2s9K7zggQk+iN/mgYuK5Iwk9t/X2rCIUE=; b=xmat1NmrKlZnCo5S3e01+aDmLxKhfRgaprQ3Lq9u0hbI4Ilmq2SYC71tQ8RCE4AduP TTiDO+8lr6BfAPlCbwLgmE+mRKTxGbPmNbL6+/teQ9vbyOFb7H4xR5wlFvqx/rRD48c3 BhmDH+qdrpA14tDORx4FfI3FyU5LUwzdYw1KM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=DO6svIjq1hBgn+uTRN94xUW86afEm7s6vJCv83fGXtfBjaNaxE0YCYeFL4T2yNYekX aGgQBCZ9IikanD4D5Up9g7caFfq4rn+gW6ilkia7OOtpmxqVCjWrgFKvUpPNrfvrSbL1 EaJg96J8vwAceeihCY7riV+OPwamArpfphrE4= Received: by 10.223.149.70 with SMTP id s6mr214760fav.66.1304517424333; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (p5DC695DF.dip.t-dialin.net [93.198.149.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9sm409233fax.3.2011.05.04.06.57.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 May 2011 06:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:56:32 +0200 From: Henry Gebhardt To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Review for initial systemd.eclass Message-ID: <20110504135632.GA2502@bimsstein> References: <20110429075841.65303f29@pomiocik.lan> <20110430231742.7423eba4@pomiocik.lan> <20110504125445.504d0ffd@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504125445.504d0ffd@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e24bf77f3a25a20e3d8e842f2d8298e9 On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:17:42 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > Here's the second version. I think the "inherit multilib" line is no longer needed. > I committed this version to gx86. All packages providing systemd units > are free to use it now, yet I'm still open to comments. Does this mean we can or should file bugs like [1] and [2] against packages? I am in particular thinking of avahi, consolekit, and soon networkmanager. Thanks, Henry [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D365941 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D365943