From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QGdUi-00087V-MS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 20:43:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B360A1C087; Sun, 1 May 2011 20:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7911C064 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 20:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so5109967wwj.10 for ; Sun, 01 May 2011 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=76Sm6NVhLuCxBz/J6n7f6y7SAtkbDuBngOLWckwfvnU=; b=eGAjENg4bS4QfEEJz10lDsWUkE1px7tpGtHmAh6toYcxHomi4tk4pFrqcJaHC416Tc r30bZvb2a8ccN+5tienb4eRAeV9ZMNCKKc+rbXUEVL/6GoG6L/6yI68dslpDRlWoKgXt xJDDVR4fMVuU4F65gWyr9aEcqflaXOTA0qgOM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=XKtTIp/4pfzeJnC8uymcOZMaU0LfaDUGnOP8waQh+ItKIO1+TR5ei75KlDgcuJmVQR wSUwjFGvN44+ciLU83Kad0r6VEQF8UtMn9g7h7NKJ4R29CvBtmiF2Vrw+gdAl1NS9krX e4H7/n0VeX9IsWkHSyavlQK4L1VScr+gkWqUU= Received: by 10.227.197.201 with SMTP id el9mr3206609wbb.22.1304282532084; Sun, 01 May 2011 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bd8sm2989965wbb.31.2011.05.01.13.42.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 01 May 2011 13:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 21:41:37 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtual for tftp server Message-ID: <20110501214137.1e0414f8@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/dOdqnDBqGm55Pd7b08U6N5e"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 37d184647a4b723ef0d7ea09ed0aed9b --Sig_/dOdqnDBqGm55Pd7b08U6N5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 1 May 2011 23:04:54 +0400 Maxim Koltsov wrote: > Assuming we have a package, that want to have any tftp server on > system, no matter which one exactly, what must we set in DEPEND? I > think creating virtual for tftp server would be nice. If it doesn't care about what the tftp server is, presumably that means that the package itself doesn't actually use the tftp server (and if it did call the tftp server, it would need to know the syntax for each individual package, so it wouldn't be a virtual). So why would it be a DEPEND? Since suggested dependencies don't exist yet, what's wrong with just elogging a message suggesting the user install a tftp server of their choice? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/dOdqnDBqGm55Pd7b08U6N5e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk29xYMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFs+wCfbD8NFRGDP/yvM5B95AKXk2DX ctoAnjU7+b7+A5cvrw20/FqCH9K9nc+v =wtol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dOdqnDBqGm55Pd7b08U6N5e--