From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45595-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QGb25-0003VD-U3
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 18:06:14 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E72541C006;
Sun, 1 May 2011 18:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E333E045E
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 1 May 2011 18:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so5220528wyi.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 May 2011 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
:in-reply-to:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=NTcyf1x3f6TnReLLW7nojm8zcRoMPrME0OS9LC1pwdA=;
b=DV25uzfMR5Uro/7dFdwdxLVm6AUVo7b9n+KvrPGl2uTKFepg+pw/OjNfS2S0Z9EHWY
BAleg9/f7PYqG9Nuh/sEsIUqm+bXdTeDrOr32b+0sJCtJaWC+8xIjqjcECpCVqBGRnVg
qAR1fEHbF/rhJ5eCKu0QQgSmy80nzoJ4PHAZI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to
:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=KiIuPRoEBakEtZ9ZDulkXKrMw66V/4FWEuIpxKy2iZAOUl2LwUiKm4f/BkhZIN28ZR
/a/oQoVeX2ll9Y6endipTpLtcUk0m+C6vB+iUYONpotHQl4ectcseKB0aL6xyFkDOlji
QhOBKxFjbZn8EAsmuuoJ4HwmN51OJXI3ocCWE=
Received: by 10.216.242.134 with SMTP id i6mr1721391wer.81.1304273128888;
Sun, 01 May 2011 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lebrodyl.localnet (89-78-62-193.dynamic.chello.pl [89.78.62.193])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c54sm2309812wer.6.2011.05.01.11.05.26
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 01 May 2011 11:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] git? [was: Re: Devmanual text on ChangeLogs]
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 20:05:15 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.37-gentoo-r4; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; )
References: <4DBBCC6D.7080504@gentoo.org> <4DBD22A7.3080500@gentoo.org> <20110501100915.GB10191@zptr-nb18>
In-Reply-To: <20110501100915.GB10191@zptr-nb18>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart6624963.vr6RtlJlIP";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201105012005.15957.reavertm@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 540f6171f2e0cc9a6d15fb9b6fd441f5
--nextPart6624963.vr6RtlJlIP
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sunday 01 of May 2011 12:09:15 Eray Aslan wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > ... the time alone if you have to stop on each package to wait for
> > echangelog to get done just doubles the amount of time you have to put
> > into committing them. That's just not worth the effort.
>=20
> Won't moving the tree to git will make this a moot discussion? These and
> similar solutions look more and more lika a band-aid to the defecencies
> of cvs.
No, because ChangeLogs could be dropped even now (and generated for rsync=20
using cvs2cl tool) since ebuild history is already available in CVS=20
(sources.gentoo.org). This discussion is about what tree changes are and wh=
ich=20
aren't relevant enough for users to be redundantly documented in ChangeLog=
=20
files assuming they're to be kept for now.
=2D-=20
regards
MM
--nextPart6624963.vr6RtlJlIP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk29oNsACgkQFuHa/bHpVdsfAgCfbSblyZcdNtlSjMyJwGSCgAHp
3HQAoLAEURXpt7O9Z50jRyOib8OI61Ev
=me/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart6624963.vr6RtlJlIP--