From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QGUkh-0008RQ-1D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 11:23:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45FD21C049; Sun, 1 May 2011 11:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93004E0384 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 11:23:06 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyy/54wX4oRGP6NKj4cDg== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet ([81.27.171.130]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo3) (RZmta 25.17) with ESMTPA id g05629n419Henh for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 13:23:05 +0200 (MEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] git? Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 13:25:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r8; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4DBBCC6D.7080504@gentoo.org> <20110501100915.GB10191@zptr-nb18> <20110501105452.GB6160@Vereniki.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110501105452.GB6160@Vereniki.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart13196578.JUsZhnJkRg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105011325.19553.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7071db0587eb906d370decd66ed77362 --nextPart13196578.JUsZhnJkRg Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sonntag 01 Mai 2011, 12:54:52 schrieb Panagiotis Christopoulos: > > What is it really that is holding us up? A dev to spearhead the move? >=20 > I had the same question yesterday but after checking [1], I can tell > that it's not so simple as it seems when you first think of it. >=20 > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D333531 Anyway it would be very nice to get some sort of status update. Apart from = one=20 comment by you, all these bugs have not been touched since september... =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart13196578.JUsZhnJkRg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk29Qx8ACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWqipQCfddK+e8PUzeMVm/1/975btUvD WbsAn0zHm8maDDFMwpSETVO4yfYEsJya =7ZcI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart13196578.JUsZhnJkRg--