From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QGLPv-0000cV-95 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 01:25:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 425481C01E; Sun, 1 May 2011 01:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FBA1C004 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 01:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so4749138wwj.10 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:25:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=QyvGaK7dNo5MYlK0pbwcbTIj5YBBpDUUxrvA8FxEaT0=; b=Cj6FJv+dcIdIcqH/Xq40hY/7z+FrB8JdhAZQamuQc3DvtrBX86QJHSS/s5QlLVU0aD GxGT9o2C5NRBm1QpAFkJmIiRW6RuVhnG3Ulm41GXBcdFBM5Z/KuIQs+rKF4G+pGqXiUl gFIwJ0/kU6eD54LlO59NiN1WZErrVCanCKqnQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=CHpOoipv8eIp190zZRk8O2GK1fnr0QEMl0k6hoT09n6kRBmnydrk/bcoZJX6HOnsBa ZMkJPf0jEGlnpoCSLtUAnRtnGEPXSvGjDbQ/6UDwpBur9E6HwW+Ly7NbmszjGJ3VhJyF ZM9vyPDg9+M/ws4nCOE9jljB9ZLVTXBhuRzIU= Received: by 10.216.191.208 with SMTP id g58mr1319901wen.85.1304213102278; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lebrodyl.localnet (89-78-62-193.dynamic.chello.pl [89.78.62.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6sm2548705wbo.37.2011.04.30.18.24.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:25:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Maciej Mrozowski To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 03:24:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-rc5-wl; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4D737C71.1040806@gentoo.org> <4DB9749C.70301@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4DB9749C.70301@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1812196.FDzxdTQY0Z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105010324.48769.reavertm@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 03e946052114cbab20471473a2338115 --nextPart1812196.FDzxdTQY0Z Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 28 of April 2011 16:07:24 Christian Ruppert wrote: > So once again: >=20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/docs/en/html/lifecycle.html >=20 > *Every* new bug filed by a user without editbugs will have "UNCONFIRMED" > (old NEW) as fixed status. > *If* we don't enable the UNCONFIRMED status at all then it will > CONFIRMED as default but we would enable the UNCONFIRMED status. >=20 > Bug wranglers can then assign the bug and they also *can* mark it as > CONFIRMED *if* they *can* confirm it. > The maintainer may change the status to IN_PROGRESS (old ASSIGNED) > afterwards. >=20 > The snipped of my first mail may be a bit confusing... It just means: > NEW will become CONFIRMED, NEW has been fully replaced by CONFIRMED so > NEW is gone but CONFIRMED is *not* the new default status. CONFIRMED > would/could be the default for everybody with editbugs. > ASSIGNED gone, replacement: IN_PROGRESS, > REOPENED gone, +1 (with comment, see below) It makes a lot more sense (and it's free from enterprisey meaning wrt ASSIG= NED=20 and such) I'd leave the default resolution status for newly created bug as UNCONFIRME= D=20 also for editbugs-accounts. It's not that it cannot be changed to CONFIRMED= in=20 'new bug' extended form. > CLOSED gone. VERIFIED will be added. I have a little worry thought (that may have been addressed somewhere in th= is=20 thread) - why is VERIFIED being added? To me it's not needed at all and the= re=20 are people who seem to have the same opinion: http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg39023.html =2D-=20 regards MM --nextPart1812196.FDzxdTQY0Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk28tmAACgkQFuHa/bHpVdt8oQCfSFWN6qfs/IEz56IWkDp27Y92 UoMAoLZ+Ca3zFODW2mSNx1jxKcdtn3e0 =2w7X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1812196.FDzxdTQY0Z--