From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: openrc portage news item
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 05:58:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110430125842.GD20648@hrair> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinSzNzbuK1gMm5ME4QJpc9L03KY=g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1432 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:03:43AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
<snip a lot of crap that is ignoring what I've been asking>
Frankly getting fairly annoyed people are immediately taking it to
the rhel/ubuntu extremes- that is *not* what I asked and is frankly
a strawman argument. Occasional pain on upgrades is a given in
gentoo, although anyone claiming we've not kept an eye on those sharp
corners is delusional (versioned eapi, etc-update's very existance,
portage warning on removal of a pkg in the system set, the list goes
on). Hell, even the notification mechanism y'all want to use for
informing is an example of trying to soften those corners were
possible, rather than precluding their existance.
I asked if we had looked at scripting away some of the upgrade pains.
It's a pretty simple fucking question requiring either a 5 second
"no" or 5 minutes of "yes, heres what we looked at, they were deemed
too painful". Answering that also is a helluva lot quicker then
people trading barbs over "we need to release it now" or proper SA;
while your retort was dead on for what folks should do, it was
completely unrelated to answering the question I'm *asking*.
If we didn't look into it, that's fine. Means I've got something to
poke at over the weekend.
If we did, and it was ruled out, awesome, I have other things on my
todo list I'll poke at this weekend.
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-30 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-13 18:15 [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item William Hubbs
2011-04-13 18:27 ` Thomas Beierlein
2011-04-13 18:32 ` justin
2011-04-13 18:41 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-04-13 19:58 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-14 8:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-14 11:44 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-15 14:04 ` Peter Hjalmarsson
2011-04-15 19:01 ` Duncan
2011-04-13 19:56 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
2011-04-14 5:30 ` justin
2011-04-14 7:21 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-04-14 8:19 ` justin
2011-04-14 8:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-14 14:44 ` Dale
2011-04-14 15:41 ` Matthew Summers
2011-04-14 16:12 ` Dale
2011-04-14 18:48 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-14 10:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kfir Lavi
2011-04-14 10:32 ` Kfir Lavi
2011-04-14 10:51 ` Tomá? Chvátal
2011-04-14 11:03 ` Pacho Ramos
2011-04-14 11:21 ` Thomas Beierlein
2011-04-14 11:27 ` Sylvain Alain
2011-04-21 1:12 ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-04-21 2:23 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-21 2:34 ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-22 10:39 ` Lars Wendler
2011-04-29 18:41 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 2:19 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-30 4:59 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 7:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-30 11:46 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 12:03 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-30 12:58 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2011-04-30 13:06 ` Jeremy Olexa
2011-04-30 13:40 ` Brian Harring
2011-04-29 7:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
2011-04-29 11:21 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 11:28 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-29 17:18 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:25 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-29 17:32 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:52 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 17:58 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-30 0:34 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-30 9:04 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2011-04-30 12:41 ` Roy Bamford
2011-04-29 14:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-05-01 19:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110430125842.GD20648@hrair \
--to=ferringb@gmail.com \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox