From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QG64w-0001lN-EH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:03:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A0C41C0D4; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ADA1C0A3 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sf (unknown [178.125.232.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: slyfox) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDA2B1B4002; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:04:32 +0300 From: Sergei Trofimovich To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: williamh@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item Message-ID: <20110430120433.6cb6d07a@sf> In-Reply-To: <20110430003417.GA6032@linux1> References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1> <20110429070831.GA27531@linux1> <20110429122803.0ecc8060@googlemail.com> <20110429171825.GA5451@lust> <19898.62584.6075.983954@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20110429175831.GB11073@lust> <20110430003417.GA6032@linux1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7cad9012fd8a53208317231a9e898cb2 --Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I don't remember the details right now, but I remember speaking with > vapier when I first started working on openrc, and he stated that he > felt we should stay away from higher eapis for system packages. >=20 > I don't really remember his reasoning for that right now, but I remember > that is why I didn't migrate the ebuild to a higher eapi a while back. Ebuild installability on horribly outdated systems? (where portage is too o= ld to support recent EAPIs). --=20 Sergei --Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk270KkACgkQcaHudmEf86oNGgCbBYFnmdkDLgL7WxblM5nmSHUP D1wAn0KEWx/uLzZVxvKleIjgzxNPoovj =aY6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/--