From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45546-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QG64w-0001lN-EH
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:03:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A0C41C0D4;
	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:02:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ADA1C0A3
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sf (unknown [178.125.232.227])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: slyfox)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDA2B1B4002;
	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:04:32 +0300
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: williamh@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item
Message-ID: <20110430120433.6cb6d07a@sf>
In-Reply-To: <20110430003417.GA6032@linux1>
References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1>
	<20110429070831.GA27531@linux1>
	<BANLkTinCS_aLBy6jJAyjph_Tj2+o=u4rbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110429122803.0ecc8060@googlemail.com>
	<20110429171825.GA5451@lust>
	<19898.62584.6075.983954@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<BANLkTimWB9MU=UP1+1QnQSFSKtbt2MyTGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110429175831.GB11073@lust>
	<20110430003417.GA6032@linux1>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 7cad9012fd8a53208317231a9e898cb2

--Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> I don't remember the details  right now, but I remember speaking with
> vapier when I first started working on openrc, and he stated that he
> felt we should stay away from higher eapis for system packages.
>=20
> I don't really remember his reasoning for that right now, but I remember
> that is why I didn't migrate the ebuild to a higher eapi a while back.

Ebuild installability on horribly outdated systems? (where portage is too o=
ld to
support recent EAPIs).

--=20

  Sergei

--Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk270KkACgkQcaHudmEf86oNGgCbBYFnmdkDLgL7WxblM5nmSHUP
D1wAn0KEWx/uLzZVxvKleIjgzxNPoovj
=aY6W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/j4POx6c3imgD_K8+=B/OWO/--