From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45525-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QFznT-0003p0-Ag
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:20:39 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF1B01C047;
	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AFE1C020
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 02:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so1997351gyh.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=u2LsdW/oTqUR0dgpJXE5PXY9r37Nc/n7UTq2zHicPoU=;
        b=WSYogXIHFigSk9rqA5OgzBHIL9EZzNNHYtaS0ZL8nRI+gq/P446W/MSYYeS8+gNj4z
         A5adJ7O8qg6ZkKmBvaeY182N1HPFHyQQvU10q9xf75N44k3+oZL3gdp/apEy1H2tMuJX
         twTrbDNSpBBrAq1tosS+0reMMa2PDW3rg7Lpw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        b=BTY2OXea9W6i5GtEHt07YQBazuYntFeYlxEM2QkElnjeVB741M0G7XxHwpjd5b4QSl
         4LuZExbXsEAkMuv6g0aN5H7VycAFySklGYwCqQ1mzUD/SAuRi2oguLI1OTaQ877/zION
         3JW026Q6jK/zLqsD8Qt462PcMN4ogTdHV4LgM=
Received: by 10.101.83.5 with SMTP id k5mr3751294anl.132.1304129993980;
        Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm3350927ang.43.2011.04.29.19.19.51
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:19:50 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:19:50 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item
Message-ID: <20110430021950.GC6032@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1>
 <BANLkTimASkRBP0exjvGNA1-5JhS_DdVe2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110421011221.GA1736@eee>
 <201104221239.11593.polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
 <20110429184135.GA20648@hrair>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110429184135.GA20648@hrair>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: b35855e364628a391cc1f747f6c4e16b


--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:41:35AM -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> Exact results please; the pkg_pretend crap proposed elsewhere (which=20
> is yet another way to crap up stage builds) frankly sucks.
>=20
> Mind you I'm just looking in, but this whole upgrade process really=20
> reads fairly suboptimal to me.  It's definitely possible that this is=20
> the best that can be done, but I'd like to see exactly which issues we=20
> can't resolve in some fashion via pkg_postinst tricks w/in openrc.
>
> I'd much rather have an ebuild that violates a few rules than forced=20
> "you must accept this beyond normal mechanisms" and potential "can't=20
> boot" upgrade processes.
>
> So... details please, and why we can't script our way past chunks of=20
> this. :)

The biggest part of the migration is running dispatch-conf, etc-update
or another configuration file updater and accepting all of the openrc
changes.  Most of the stuff in the migration guide is just directing
you to verify changes that the openrc ebuild has made and telling you
which configuration files may need to be altered to match your system.
I'm not sure how to script passed any of that.

William


--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk27ccYACgkQblQW9DDEZTh2agCfUyHNpT4tBbPi8TsKbMumbTiN
ypgAn2GUMlIsIIP7N1brcRgO1t+HRnaG
=nM0b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG--