From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45523-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1QFy9g-00044v-Gf
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:35:29 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AC58E049A;
Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:35:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE0E0484
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so1979007yia.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id
:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
bh=o29Gs1lgRBhGTIPctnzTf/o0iliLAb0XuNoeY22MCQs=;
b=QhK9X2aA4+sq/riK0IybR5VdeSyaFEjSaSkqp8pJZkXTEUGtAE8WBVqsm7WNXoGQop
qraps2QYzrxiGECxzLcAYBQjQ/y3qIqZvPBKy+yb5sqappcReNhJUM0MZfep24kXYGxC
33D6+Vz4VUtyBPR3HnwK8Mme8BAPwnQmRvLko=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
:user-agent;
b=rHPwMoUgOsH5hMmPF3Hs27iXKA4O5DQ4TrdtXwKr9tm/uhk52qskDneMetqWA+dBif
xruZQr7RnW69FoOZMHGgZXBPH8qR8YK7Atfb1IoUs4Gziq+ehVhxOX0nK8LRchfQ/ECl
+xeqmdfuQBl4KFCDF/Q4BadFprAsMYOOXMs9Y=
Received: by 10.151.79.5 with SMTP id g5mr5071064ybl.330.1304123661586;
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l2sm1587342ybn.18.2011.04.29.17.34.18
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:34:17 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:34:17 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item
Message-ID: <20110430003417.GA6032@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1>
<20110429070831.GA27531@linux1>
<BANLkTinCS_aLBy6jJAyjph_Tj2+o=u4rbw@mail.gmail.com>
<20110429122803.0ecc8060@googlemail.com>
<20110429171825.GA5451@lust>
<19898.62584.6075.983954@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<BANLkTimWB9MU=UP1+1QnQSFSKtbt2MyTGA@mail.gmail.com>
<20110429175831.GB11073@lust>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110429175831.GB11073@lust>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: f23f452ea28ffef014170302dc91a5f1
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:58:31PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote:
> > >
> > >> please have a look at the attached patch.
> > >
> > >> -EAPI=3D"1"
> > >> +EAPI=3D"4"
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style"
> > > to "EAPI 2 style" too?
> >=20
> > If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month
> > waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point? From
> > an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no
> > benefit. Why not just deal with that in a future revision?
> >=20
> > I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI
> > simply because 4 > 1.
>=20
> EAPI was bumped so I could use pkg_pretend, please check out my
> (incomplete) patch.
I don't remember the details right now, but I remember speaking with
vapier when I first started working on openrc, and he stated that he
felt we should stay away from higher eapis for system packages.
I don't really remember his reasoning for that right now, but I remember
that is why I didn't migrate the ebuild to a higher eapi a while back.
Also, this patch doesn't stop baselayout-2 from being installed, so I do
not know what state it would leave a system in if you ran this and
happened to upgrade baselayout, then reboot without installing openrc.
William
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk27WQkACgkQblQW9DDEZTh0xgCdF1F1u1UFzZweegUi3Jz93Q1I
/N0An0rPH0CGV4bRl97M3K+04siTUoZl
=WLyu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--