From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QFy9g-00044v-Gf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:35:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AC58E049A; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE0E0484 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so1979007yia.40 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:34:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=o29Gs1lgRBhGTIPctnzTf/o0iliLAb0XuNoeY22MCQs=; b=QhK9X2aA4+sq/riK0IybR5VdeSyaFEjSaSkqp8pJZkXTEUGtAE8WBVqsm7WNXoGQop qraps2QYzrxiGECxzLcAYBQjQ/y3qIqZvPBKy+yb5sqappcReNhJUM0MZfep24kXYGxC 33D6+Vz4VUtyBPR3HnwK8Mme8BAPwnQmRvLko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=rHPwMoUgOsH5hMmPF3Hs27iXKA4O5DQ4TrdtXwKr9tm/uhk52qskDneMetqWA+dBif xruZQr7RnW69FoOZMHGgZXBPH8qR8YK7Atfb1IoUs4Gziq+ehVhxOX0nK8LRchfQ/ECl +xeqmdfuQBl4KFCDF/Q4BadFprAsMYOOXMs9Y= Received: by 10.151.79.5 with SMTP id g5mr5071064ybl.330.1304123661586; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l2sm1587342ybn.18.2011.04.29.17.34.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:34:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:34:17 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item Message-ID: <20110430003417.GA6032@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1> <20110429070831.GA27531@linux1> <20110429122803.0ecc8060@googlemail.com> <20110429171825.GA5451@lust> <19898.62584.6075.983954@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20110429175831.GB11073@lust> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110429175831.GB11073@lust> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f23f452ea28ffef014170302dc91a5f1 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:58:31PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote: > > > > > >> please have a look at the attached patch. > > > > > >> -EAPI=3D"1" > > >> +EAPI=3D"4" > > > > > > Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style" > > > to "EAPI 2 style" too? > >=20 > > If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month > > waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point? From > > an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no > > benefit. Why not just deal with that in a future revision? > >=20 > > I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI > > simply because 4 > 1. >=20 > EAPI was bumped so I could use pkg_pretend, please check out my > (incomplete) patch. I don't remember the details right now, but I remember speaking with vapier when I first started working on openrc, and he stated that he felt we should stay away from higher eapis for system packages. I don't really remember his reasoning for that right now, but I remember that is why I didn't migrate the ebuild to a higher eapi a while back. Also, this patch doesn't stop baselayout-2 from being installed, so I do not know what state it would leave a system in if you ran this and happened to upgrade baselayout, then reboot without installing openrc. William --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk27WQkACgkQblQW9DDEZTh0xgCdF1F1u1UFzZweegUi3Jz93Q1I /N0An0rPH0CGV4bRl97M3K+04siTUoZl =WLyu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--