public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Alexander <wired@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:58:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110429175831.GB11073@lust> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimWB9MU=UP1+1QnQSFSKtbt2MyTGA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote:
> >
> >> please have a look at the attached patch.
> >
> >> -EAPI="1"
> >> +EAPI="4"
> >
> > Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style"
> > to "EAPI 2 style" too?
> 
> If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month
> waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point?  From
> an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no
> benefit.  Why not just deal with that in a future revision?
> 
> I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI
> simply because 4 > 1.

EAPI was bumped so I could use pkg_pretend, please check out my
(incomplete) patch.

-- 
Alex Alexander | wired
+ Gentoo Linux Developer
++ www.linuxized.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-29 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-13 18:15 [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item William Hubbs
2011-04-13 18:27 ` Thomas Beierlein
2011-04-13 18:32 ` justin
2011-04-13 18:41 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-04-13 19:58   ` William Hubbs
2011-04-14  8:09     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-14 11:44       ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-15 14:04       ` Peter Hjalmarsson
2011-04-15 19:01         ` Duncan
2011-04-13 19:56 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
2011-04-14  5:30   ` justin
2011-04-14  7:21     ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2011-04-14  8:19       ` justin
2011-04-14  8:40       ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-14 14:44         ` Dale
2011-04-14 15:41           ` Matthew Summers
2011-04-14 16:12             ` Dale
2011-04-14 18:48             ` William Hubbs
2011-04-14 10:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kfir Lavi
2011-04-14 10:32   ` Kfir Lavi
2011-04-14 10:51   ` Tomá? Chvátal
2011-04-14 11:03     ` Pacho Ramos
2011-04-14 11:21     ` Thomas Beierlein
2011-04-14 11:27       ` Sylvain Alain
2011-04-21  1:12   ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-04-21  2:23     ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-21  2:34       ` Jeroen Roovers
2011-04-22 10:39     ` Lars Wendler
2011-04-29 18:41       ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30  2:19         ` William Hubbs
2011-04-30  4:59           ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30  7:13             ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-04-30 11:46               ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 12:03                 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-30 12:58                   ` Brian Harring
2011-04-30 13:06                     ` Jeremy Olexa
2011-04-30 13:40                       ` Brian Harring
2011-04-29  7:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs
2011-04-29 11:21   ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 11:28     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-29 17:18       ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:25         ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-29 17:32           ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:52           ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 17:58             ` Alex Alexander [this message]
2011-04-30  0:34               ` William Hubbs
2011-04-30  9:04                 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2011-04-30 12:41                 ` Roy Bamford
2011-04-29 14:27   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2011-05-01 19:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110429175831.GB11073@lust \
    --to=wired@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox