From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QFlsd-0003pq-29 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:29:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9053F1C06B; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D49A1C03D for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so3710210wwj.10 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=DH5cAo9aPQEeE2xIuBzcGGsrbMruLKnJ+BQI0XHy+nA=; b=BiOPx+r5QmyjJx/cqogz+qUpvzHqGAn85VwE0pBFqVZM6VyZaUp+7Pgihi777pU2ul jdUgnGL8RCSVW3c0+5Y1MVsHpmoXOmFeI3wOFKgwIoGWKG3BQawv9XwpGSIpB/8OkPv0 LtS3uQhL1HA2zz/zASez59uzYh/Vs5v7iXTvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=RvqBPvVsSRkOSGyVVZRAh7vbTUuBAUb19FzuVWfp4VGasrBuF4VFOpQiQF5nwo9eIF MePC3h1KcXpH3yKZiqkfYZKtAFTjnHWq4T0WVBth50ag3sPMyAGlZD2AjZeSG9kswgyF lbjre9BOhdV0uioKOzY82Ihii8Q7tpjQeDsGY= Received: by 10.216.232.13 with SMTP id m13mr481872weq.110.1304076508458; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w12sm1649309wby.7.2011.04.29.04.28.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:28:03 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item Message-ID: <20110429122803.0ecc8060@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1> <20110429070831.GA27531@linux1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/+hezzI+qewM.uZ3FFaqRqWG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a32999d4f86ef9face75dc86c821099e --Sig_/+hezzI+qewM.uZ3FFaqRqWG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:21:23 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > Perhaps a future/in-progress EAPI could define a mechanism where an > ebuild can indicate that a particular update or set of circumstances > is a system-critical change, and that the package manager should > consequently alert the user and ensure that they have confirmed the > action. pkg_pretend can do that... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/+hezzI+qewM.uZ3FFaqRqWG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk26oMYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhH/rQCg5kcTuyXz3l1EjQjo4EE79X8n V70AoJKoo/kENyo8FiNogDxdtEYI/ukv =R6Px -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+hezzI+qewM.uZ3FFaqRqWG--