From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45425-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1QE6yX-0005uM-Mq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:36:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 897C71C0C4; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EE31C015 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so710016gxk.40 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:35:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=j6qcc6DKPN1bmtSgfi4kjdOMqW5Pn5+bpSSfmjPkm9c=; b=LZPGd74maQolgcGN+RmGrNbIqXInrtRcPnm6Ge5ltjC3L6Lnwk+ACBoWKkVttBvwij pKYcypki5TFEzLOGYcksYEERK8RZ7s4j3V1R/5DCoa0qXn5FtrQJR5LmH5gkEwx7cN+d FMd3Kf6nRp5lFIGrPwTbnOsSJ/jOba3QKLL7o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=qpuxIkieP0cDFUX6xqtht9mKXcKZ2IzuZ7tCpKZEjncffzCFS/Ah0gOgHX4Bhni3VT 2h6bofAECwBJqnEeSzeRsrd11FPzMYgpHDngLdB+fgp5pcU0WG+1h9BRgqTUF0avDeU1 c1MErLaaJmGFgxnsjZUAGiVPsbSa8P8paowes= Received: by 10.101.137.17 with SMTP id p17mr1361838ann.10.1303680921359; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x34sm5083716ana.10.2011.04.24.14.35.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 14:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com> Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:35:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:35:15 -0500 From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Installing systemd units with gx86 packages Message-ID: <20110424213515.GB24011@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110424093630.6794a5cd@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110424093630.6794a5cd@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 1ac1070e3d006ae979be3c5fe394b37f --lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:36:30AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Fellow devs, >=20 > I've started working on bringing systemd to Gentoo [1] lately, > and I think it is important to raise the aspect of systemd unit > inclusion in various packages in gx86 ASAP. >=20 > The number of packages coming with systemd units is growing rapidly > recently, and that especially applies to freedesktop packages. > One side effect of that is that these packages treat systemd > as an automagic dependency, installing systemd units whenever its > pkgconfig file is installed. I already opened two bugs on that [2,3] > but there would be much more... I think the better way to handle this will be to patch the build systems to not make this an automagic dependency and send those patches upstream. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/automagic.xml I'm not a member of qa, but I agree with this position on automagic dependencies. William --lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk20l5MACgkQblQW9DDEZTgRvACfYr8tN6Pge3WsIQwHrE5HguM5 r3sAnRu67BMq72uAyET99km8dqOTJ5WG =q1bz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2--