From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDbjd-0001IW-H9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:14:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F00A11C0D3; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3192B1C00C for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1093288wwj.10 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 05:14:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=1C9ba3//OKDWbrGyWtpWIVJBsvXA7n5UTkM9dTHw0bQ=; b=a2Ds4bfAQdy+CWM0NJqIH7adlKGw/kZW29b0/BWN/abAARxLBL3Ijgb3UGokiF+Z8Q xLebGILalJ9xUfTo+cXKmlar29yNi9qXmDseGaiaP/fivC/yXniSBrid8hbKZuuFh0Bz 2+cvpbpz2nMs8IiVfFUjaWEOKQLOlZxvpx4hQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=Y5GJhRo7qsCgmKxn5ZU2n+14Pnzr7vsuiZ33LHkOKCq9Bps7tzYoviHV1ANmlxAPGo v0SNceM+agHnWb9McQB5+4j3r+GSJBHuxqRS5/+VWRhiclg4a5zRP02Oe11wNOyztAow XdZ3vI7ESwNYAo99AWTCQiEWkC/S9mhnHwTJM= Received: by 10.227.208.207 with SMTP id gd15mr2100470wbb.93.1303560854334; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 05:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y29sm2239693wbd.4.2011.04.23.05.14.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 05:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:08:54 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Message-ID: <20110423130854.64611a48@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB2C0F9.3090501@gentoo.org> References: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org> <4DB2B1C0.2050708@gentoo.org> <4DB2C0F9.3090501@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Ihp03HQ+2YojmK7xx4_JA7a"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f38b8261d6f1b3f483a7fd73cd584f3d --Sig_/Ihp03HQ+2YojmK7xx4_JA7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:07:21 +0200 Thomas Sachau wrote: > It may be no issue as long as the virtual does not change that much > or as long as not more than 1 overlay forks the virtual. But as > already written in Bugzilla, you create an issue for users, if you > have 2 overlays added, which both provide the package. Simple > example, which i presented in Bugzilla: That's solved by giving Portage proper multi-repository support. Wasn't that one of last year's Summer of Code projects? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/Ihp03HQ+2YojmK7xx4_JA7a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2ywVgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGuwgCfbemDA98+seo0PtOYaySOvTpZ oPkAoK9xqnj/Zh/+laPeOmqIEG9x/sY/ =iKS2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Ihp03HQ+2YojmK7xx4_JA7a--