From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDbCi-0006e6-OW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:40:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81C571C0C9; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4850F1C019 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so351569wwi.4 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=EMqJXyT7eXlfJtQZZghayKDJiyVAlTa8DLpkB1F26iE=; b=cc0Z7qczSinfufD0Hw6aDoNGDvaQpMeE4RiQ1eKhm3CVmWOAA+p5NAgAKC6VoWxj+N 2Cttx/wsdTKdqL7Y8sL9GdVoTpPa+a8rlpb07E9NDWwMfrWTQqbqr1DaAu9lPoGgYP76 EnvcodrsPA9zJAC5SM+NRzl7sqC/j9EbTHkDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=dHlsUTqmo9idbhwINdAmtHxApUnEJSKtfsAMixLdrIkK1PZLNBx6nd7zM4CU9dLB2m +NO3MJBVuH7enAcUp9P9dxbW7SZxfgJcMrz4SQZAHxGZnWkTrSICsh2ZzU8Qo6PojV/j NQPQzW9kdxqdWVxCqdxXpWuQmmGDu+aX1PAGU= Received: by 10.216.235.158 with SMTP id u30mr1913547weq.104.1303558815463; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f30sm1763426wef.7.2011.04.23.04.40.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:34:54 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Message-ID: <20110423123454.506fb6bc@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org> References: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/_Tzb=Gl/Fj4QhTpNR7t+cAO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9a0de40a3aec04996fa95d9b6e098e54 --Sig_/_Tzb=Gl/Fj4QhTpNR7t+cAO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:05:48 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote: > Comments on how to proceed? Is it OK for a virtual to list a package > which is in an overlay in RDEPEND? The way || ( ) dependencies are defined means doing so doesn't cause any problems. Having said that, overlays can always supply their own version of the virtual package if they prefer. It's not ideal, but it does mean that overlays aren't subjected to the whim of whoever's handling the virtual in the main tree. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/_Tzb=Gl/Fj4QhTpNR7t+cAO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2yuWEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFVAgCfaJRV/YUAMJCHARTPb7nbNEcA Nd4An1Lmmc/Tp2rN0Zh/v/Lo381NdypU =dR6M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_Tzb=Gl/Fj4QhTpNR7t+cAO--