From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QDbAZ-0006SI-3G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:38:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DFD31C019; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCC91C0A6 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1080826wwj.10 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:37:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=PppFs1rYKdkVhLla1Vc0Z/dfulTDzkP3yAUufS9iW7o=; b=dN2q9jZ/yNnZougIG42DsOlWKkhzCY4pXqpizUr6HBP+0TB0PMu2AqsVEaEu37bj3g M8aObnn0LXvMdCSJxElOnGwW2rXw1G4HmKmbLCOr8iqJrhsH0Dkv0upRQgnhXlQM/Amo 9isHeiwvnaIdN761BSUZExp3t4/I9vwMqUvT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=kbrKkPBs7R2gDDbhAK+UZOj7suia+WWuHyQTRmKvGePptbcT2PUlFjtKHh3W981PHr P/D14QxDZbGRq2SLxXdxRbTRSRpxjPaZVYVFN6ibrKgBNIOYPlUQci2+07PBesj03Eo0 Lk0r6TanQITVgg8oD5+tSBx1EIa5Jey0+6kvk= Received: by 10.216.69.74 with SMTP id m52mr2267769wed.33.1303558676096; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c54sm1757947wer.30.2011.04.23.04.37.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:32:35 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Message-ID: <20110423123235.1d618818@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB2A9CD.7010708@gentoo.org> References: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org> <4DB2A9CD.7010708@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/w5NmKAh=/NhEvBwc.EisekY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 413bf95f679492643c0aee7eff6e25a7 --Sig_/w5NmKAh=/NhEvBwc.EisekY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:28:29 +0200 Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: > Would it make sense to do the following: > (1) make all new-style virtuals additionally depend on an old-style > virtual (a new category might be appropriate) No. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/w5NmKAh=/NhEvBwc.EisekY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2yuNUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhESpwCgpyR6E4voFCM7uquCIg4IptJ2 EswAn3zDwgmU8CfZ8I0xDwMRXQqH0tK/ =PwyH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w5NmKAh=/NhEvBwc.EisekY--