From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QCcRF-0005Az-NK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:47:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4025F1C0BE; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7001C093 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:980:57a5:1:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QCcPj-0006bf-DT for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:46:12 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:44:22 +0200 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc use flag Message-ID: <20110420184422.GH1009@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20110420172419.GC12411@linux1> <1303322561.22688.9.camel@tablet> <20110420182253.GA12829@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110420182253.GA12829@linux1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b66d04fd2df321e0ed7f3dada1977eee On 20-04-2011 13:22:53 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:02:41PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > > =D0=92 =D0=A1=D1=80=D0=B4, 20/04/2011 =D0=B2 12:24 -0500, William Hub= bs =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > > The author of the bug feels that the way to fix this is for us to p= ut a > > > check in openrc that makes it refuse to run services if it was not = used > > > in the boot process. > >=20 > > This is good idea to have in any case since I remember my system went > > crazy after I've tried to start some service inside chroot. >=20 > My concern about it though is prefix installs. If I implement something > like this, will it not break openrc on prefix systems? does such thing exist? --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level