From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44988-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Q3DAC-00042w-Dw
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:59:21 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 913251C0AD;
	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:58:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.155.51])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8161C0E2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:57:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 898381E27
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:57:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from grenadine.localnet (pc59050.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.102.87])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	(Authenticated sender: hua59129)
	by rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 831581D46
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:57:54 +0100 (CET)
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:58:05 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; )
References: <AANLkTi=4o69ytUxAVpy-O31AWQv-5p4bEWD2466NWYGx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin_9vj+zavh_Pn_PiuZXytw5DVyr31rxZVhWGCC@mail.gmail.com> <robbat2-20110325T184016-199253117Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20110325T184016-199253117Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1878467.MgHpBojen3";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha512
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201103252058.05866.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 7853d5ac0b1a04d85331f9138d643c96

--nextPart1878467.MgHpBojen3
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> The SKS rotation seems to be much better, and kingtaco was looking at
> running an additional SKS instance within Gentoo as our offical key
> point (also useful for speeding up fetching keys in verification).

Good idea.

=2D-=20
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/

--nextPart1878467.MgHpBojen3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=1IBK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1878467.MgHpBojen3--