From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44985-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Q3CwL-0002SM-R9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:44:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E7441C0AD; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.155.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7888E1C076 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B8AF91E52 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:44:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from grenadine.localnet (pc59050.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.102.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hua59129) by rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B25541E27 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:44:24 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:44:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <AANLkTi=4o69ytUxAVpy-O31AWQv-5p4bEWD2466NWYGx@mail.gmail.com> <20110325002124.GA23059@hrair> <AANLkTimJWtTjy0uk3zbW4S=XTdf65szYk6GR2svXr9dk@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJWtTjy0uk3zbW4S=XTdf65szYk6GR2svXr9dk@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart12783417.OeoEIbq5zm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103252044.36023.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 14f900c1c312743da7bb8f964891552a --nextPart12783417.OeoEIbq5zm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > i dont expect the rejection to go into effect $now, so people not > signing have plenty of time to start doing so Is the additional effort of implementing this for CVS with the current two-= stage commit even worth it? I.e. would it not make more sense to wait _with the automated rejection_ un= til we finally made the Big Jump To Git?! This does not mean that we cannot prepare everything else in the meantime... =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart12783417.OeoEIbq5zm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJNjPCjAAoJEEb+UGWnxTyHFGwP/3pmqY6nsAtTbsyEYIfQ6zNR eJfPj0t4gN/0zU8mVlqKfN4+XvUF5YnQhTwmhNZXvX0QSuhEY0Q1s7pg7imDvVzo 1ETpAxpFNziDmNInKNQUMf/JxnzigX1StFhzp2kKfhIhaWycHLAdcHbfMfT9u343 w/DyEyS76pM4mvrQZ1eupCtkF1yTyqvZn4nPYW9rCuuurLvNBFaA7d5OtJjuo9A8 GtL6tuoH4hIjNyc9Y1+pkfeh9BO/D6rj7zAvrgmQqTvRe3peC1jFQgDHytFU1fXM SjQApcZCZaXawEUR59NQI6ORJe1Me6fxQ5iAVTAtB2w0zJzl7r4A8C1LPfiPNa01 cZx8Jk8zqSNl9gBU0M63w3UNPIxb0Oxci/unfhNvHM7fCvb4WQUKsMiSRL1cMJEH CQjEJMl1VIPRfw5ysENwLpcjKRW1WzLFKCpvrsOsD7Uc6bEEce4HJgkH8SfrWbuu QPuhouXwRUTYVXy0GUn0arM2hUoFxaZowQh1YNBVHydGBK7K7CNtVq52soiO/gdX 1oMMd/UzqJ75it9bQEVjQowFJzuTRDCuopC/Lu262PhQa4L0tsuD86+RCkFYHAXY h3sEyA1WD3iT0ewqndvHCNccDm222mNmUUR4jJgpsK04qn/LOExQnxWdUiFzzP+8 WImycNWX3CMw02jiBd/0 =hT1R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart12783417.OeoEIbq5zm--