From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q34zj-00019P-24 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:15:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B06C1C048; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.155.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE241C025 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 09E6C20A8 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from grenadine.localnet (pc59050.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.102.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: hua59129) by rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02E482026 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:09 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <1301047872.24707.10.camel@tablet> In-Reply-To: <1301047872.24707.10.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart15894193.0Jk0gPHnsP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103251215.20344.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8b0237f590b249017584d995b629302a --nextPart15894193.0Jk0gPHnsP Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 25 March 2011 11:11:12 Peter Volkov wrote: > =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 24/03/2011 =D0=B2 17:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned > > Manifest's anymore ?=20 >=20 > Why? Without policy on how we do that and more importantly how we check > that signing makes no sense... >=20 I guess it's more about starting somewhere and getting required stuff into = place step by step... =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart15894193.0Jk0gPHnsP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJNjHlIAAoJEEb+UGWnxTyHHS0P/1haSBs7BL4gt+QC3cGDHFQm GFHRiQx3vVmMce5wlyEEX5tUR+AoFqf5BUEYv8sk0asHiiUBC9hLZ4gX37JcZwPw xxKAp6OqIWROVNOAzMb9M4rwVPn7Pr0sodfOPs1md3Pz9+giirGmOrG/IjrKut43 TAbwXdFoUG9KzZ3cjSF2SRQz4tI7RAO1eSlJwURGqB8BvYphVxxmEpnx1NhWZkME Zn5DtrSDvlj1EWLq5Sy+/STVjH3rztvJnke0ZHxF3MB7KBrHFnSXJyeEOxRgeOIB xwKlGs4qkPQEiqzmEAy4R2slA5Nu24Hd7OeJI/pnzcm0eX5Wsij67lApJJqj8Wei HN8cteUW8s5uLv8JMYp9vYInzxsP34E65FYd2K+0VdY+JWveHB7/mcpndjyz1K0f v45HxIkUYCaKvck5H9xWKNKiHxKmlFqifCqn4SR/0XTMkuMYDMJencnE+OiUXAtO 5NY5itHn4iL+Ew4lp1tqJvqCRMsAye43u7ZmZfyphjR/DOJDR9x1BVMujt67EUj6 MwJx2rAfmOiE5pI/me3TMEbDiFVRHnQt+bUHTLqRe1+QZLAl+leX+0ChmlSe+R8W ka8Tfn4Ob9v3PehWL7c75EF9sBpzmcR3Q0p7LNgBJUqUf6nGw08bZo0zqeXskwQ0 5dS4LAAySfMbkw48aPw+ =0NEn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15894193.0Jk0gPHnsP--