From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2BC2-0004Ld-Jd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 955591C09B; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3E41C019 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA711B408A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.333 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.333 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.734, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0J50i4Z8B9e for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF901B402E for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2BBF-0007Dv-3b for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:40:05 +0100 Received: from 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([216.197.246.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:40:05 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:40:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:45:51 -0600 Message-ID: <20110322174551.21b40d62@gentoo.org> References: <4D890F8D.4090706@gentoo.org> <4D8924CD.8000404@gentoo.org> <20110322174127.259ab257@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1VzSs0q=d8sFn1rk+xbHoR6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cd154fe12cd6e7eb7a800188f4e84185 --Sig_/1VzSs0q=d8sFn1rk+xbHoR6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:41:27 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: >=20 >=20 > > > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \ > >=20 > > this means you need to have DEPEND=3D"net-misc/rsync". why not just use > > `cp -pPR` instead ? i vaguely recall rsync being slower than a > > straight cp too ... not much point of doing a rsync when the vast > > majority of the time (all the time?) the destination is empty. >=20 > i think i remember doing some time tests using a tar pipe at one point wi= th > subversion.eclass that blew cp out of the water. That's because subversion.eclass was copying over .svn directories and then deleting them afterward, and i was using tar's --exclude instead, nevermind. --=20 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 06= 62 --Sig_/1VzSs0q=d8sFn1rk+xbHoR6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2JNK8ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmKM+gCeMDdiSjE0USt3XXEjWHHGpUSL b+YAnA3gtZZizhknA4nWKhvk0ynAs3ll =tPHr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1VzSs0q=d8sFn1rk+xbHoR6--