[gentoo-dev] Re: git-2.eclass final review

[Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1041 bytes --]

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:41:27 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:08:53 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > rsync -rlpgo . "${EGIT_SOURCEDIR}" \
> > 
> > this means you need to have DEPEND="net-misc/rsync".  why not just use
> > `cp -pPR` instead ?  i vaguely recall rsync being slower than a
> > straight cp too ... not much point of doing a rsync when the vast
> > majority of the time (all the time?) the destination is empty.
> 
> i think i remember doing some time tests using a tar pipe at one point with
> subversion.eclass that blew cp out of the water.

That's because subversion.eclass was copying over .svn directories and
then deleting them afterward, and i was using tar's --exclude instead,
nevermind.


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,                  it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets                           but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]