From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PxuAS-0004SC-Cg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADD07E0687; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78C8E05EC for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0EA1B400A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:41:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.408 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.408 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.809, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JCK-hxoET8hH for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60841B4004 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pxu9i-0007pA-Oy for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:40:50 +0100 Received: from 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([216.197.246.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:40:50 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:40:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Quantity of open bugs Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:46:37 -0600 Message-ID: <20110310224637.149e16da@gentoo.org> References: <20110307130425.3C1ED1C042@pigeon.gentoo.org> <20110310202510.45627780@athlong2.kevquinn.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/GU6wMVURabHwx3WHiSis28K"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: dff244fcf4dcdf01a92dcb69359745ab --Sig_/GU6wMVURabHwx3WHiSis28K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:25:10 +0000 "Kevin F. Quinn" wrote: > I would guess these old untouched bugs aren't actually going to be > touched, ever - a lot simply won't be relevant any more for one reason > or another. All they're doing is cluttering up bugzilla. I never understand this argument. How does an open bug "clutter" up bugzil= la any more than a closed bug? It's pretty simple. If a bug isn't fixed, it should be open. Automatical= ly closing them doesn't make things "better", it just generates shitloads of useless mail. --=20 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 06= 62 --Sig_/GU6wMVURabHwx3WHiSis28K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk15qS0ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmLMYgCdE0Ag8UY0vZR0S785Yk6MKT/U qjYAnAvhEiTLbSCepQOsD8DPMGofZLM6 =JK3c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/GU6wMVURabHwx3WHiSis28K--