From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Pxu0F-0003cx-Qp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:31:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F25F2E0642; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B499E0486 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932451B400A for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:30:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.432 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.432 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.833, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Au1yCd8bit7Q for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D361B4004 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxtzQ-00057H-GZ for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:30:12 +0100 Received: from 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([216.197.246.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:30:12 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:30:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:35:55 -0600 Message-ID: <20110310223555.11bc2947@gentoo.org> References: <4D737C71.1040806@gentoo.org> <20110306125029.GA9616@hrair> <4D74883E.9010004@gentoo.org> <20110307101352.GD9616@hrair> <4D78B196.80609@gentoo.org> <20110310111542.GA10933@Eternity.halls.manchester.ac.uk> <20110310204229.314f784d@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <1299786777-sup-5793@ittemni> <20110311045219.032437fe@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/JpeEoPHDoMqkN.pf4Ezxq=A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216-197-246-66.msjw.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 15bf8621b0ee69287d703dd7b28e4c5a --Sig_/JpeEoPHDoMqkN.pf4Ezxq=A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:52:19 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:06:54 +0100 > Amadeusz =C5=BBo=C5=82nowski wrote: >=20 > > > Status =3D NEW && Assignee =3D bug-wranglers -> Status =3D UNCONFIRMED > > > Status =3D NEW && Assignee =3D [maintainer] -> Status =3D CONFIRMED > >=20 > > Who confirms the bug? I would expect that CONFIRMED is set by the > > package maintainer and the one who assigns bugs leaves the status. >=20 > I was referring to existing bug reports, not new ones. New ones should > come in as UNCONFIRMED and would be changed to CONFIRMED when assigned > - bug wrangling does have this element of validation, you know. > Apparently when maintainers accept the bug, it changes to IN PROGRESS, > and when [s]he doesn't it should be resolved as invalid or duplicate > or whatever, but heck, maybe the flow chart should speak for itself. Bug wranglers should only mark bugs CONFIRMED if they can personally reproduce them. If no one has produced the bug other than the original poster then that's the very definition of UNCONFIRMED. Or maybe you're thinking CONFIRMED as in "I confirm this is a bug report and not a lunch order"? --=20 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 06= 62 --Sig_/JpeEoPHDoMqkN.pf4Ezxq=A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk15pq8ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmJB4QCgoTQshsfKVcgi8p1pByxYBc6M jSAAoODLQ4cheoTXCJUQ5HMnZcofzckq =fXJr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/JpeEoPHDoMqkN.pf4Ezxq=A--