From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Pxk3i-0002IJ-BI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:53:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4527B1C008; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA439E0084 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-254-77-36.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.77.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1544C1B4099; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:52:30 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: jlec@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making largefile a global use Message-ID: <20110310185230.3136f9c8@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <4D78A04F.3070206@gentoo.org> References: <4D7886F8.2030507@gentoo.org> <1299750299.2212.57.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu> <4D78A04F.3070206@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Ukvzngcw2duJVnFo08L4p/n"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b5d6ee7d886cc15e920fb4e7ba865d91 --Sig_/Ukvzngcw2duJVnFo08L4p/n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:56:31 +0100 justin wrote: > On 10/03/11 10:44, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > > Il giorno gio, 10/03/2011 alle 09.08 +0100, justin ha scritto: > >> > >> there are not many packages using it, but I will add this flag to > >> another 10.=20 > >=20 > > Why? >=20 > just because upstream has this configure flag. but it seems we agree > on removing the flag completely, defaulting on largefile support and > fixing what needs a fix. > Correct? +1 on forcing it always on. gpgme already requires all packages linked against it to use same largefile switch value as it does, and maintaining the ability to switch it on/off just creates more trouble than profit. The only use case I see for the explicit switch possibility are the dependencies of -bin packages. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/Ukvzngcw2duJVnFo08L4p/n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk15D+QACgkQnGSe5QXeB7v8HgCeJVUnFyzHN+ulgJKnAz9/pFkN vYEAnRbqnN2zJKlPDnc0+OqvyCXN9rb2 =7bSr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Ukvzngcw2duJVnFo08L4p/n--