From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PxRjT-0007WP-HV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:19:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14C5D1C020; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4362E06AF for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF1A1B40D3 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:19:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] updating GLEP 1 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:19:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2209031.GsvdqVs2C1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103091719.01383.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cb659d64b3260623782eeaf5d839d537 --nextPart2209031.GsvdqVs2C1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable the first GLEP is listed as Active, yet its information is out of date. it talks about GLEP editors and Gentoo Managers, neither of which exist anymor= e.=20 basically, it still refers to the old management structure and not the Council. so rather than confuse people (since we explicitly quiz people on this), how about this update: =2D-- glep-0001.txt 5 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000 1.12 +++ glep-0001.txt 9 Mar 2011 22:18:07 -0000 @@ -98,21 +98,20 @@ the form of code, patch, or URL to same=20 =20 GLEP authors are responsible for collecting community feedback on a GLEP before submitting it for review. A GLEP that has not been discussed on =2Dgentoo-dev@gentoo.org and/or the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not= be +gentoo-dev@gentoo.org and the Gentoo Linux forums [#FORUMS]_ will not be accepted. However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions on publ= ic mailing lists should be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions effic= ient include setting up a specific forums thread for the topic, having the GLEP author accept private comments in the early design phases, etc. GLEP auth= ors should use their discretion here. =20 =2DOnce the authors have completed a GLEP, they must inform the GLEP editor= s that =2Dit is ready for review. GLEPs are reviewed by the appropriate Gentoo =2DManager [#MANAGER]_, who may approve or reject a GLEP outright, or =2Dsend it back to the author(s) for revision. For a GLEP that is pre-dete= rmined =2Dto be approvable (e.g., it is an obvious win as-is and/or its implementa= tion =2Dhas already been checked in) the appropriate Gentoo Manager [#MANAGER]_ =2Dmay also initiate a GLEP review, first notifying the GLEP author(s) and = giving =2Dthem a chance to make revisions. +Once the authors have completed a GLEP, they must inform the Gentoo Council +[#COUNCIL]_ that it is ready for review by way of the gentoo-dev mailing +list. GLEPs are then reviewed at a Council meeting where it may be approv= ed +or rejected outright, or send it back to the author(s) for revision. This +generally should be done a few weeks in advance of the actual review so as= to +avoid the appearance of "slipping" a GLEP in without proper public review +by the Gentoo developer community. =20 For a GLEP to be approved it must meet certain minimum criteria. It must = be a clear and complete description of the proposed enhancement. The enhanceme= nt @@ -338,7 +337,7 @@ References and Footnotes =20 .. [#FORUMS] http://forums.gentoo.org =20 =2D.. [#MANAGER] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/management-structure.xml +.. [#COUNCIL] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html =20 .. [#OPL] http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ =20 =2Dmike --nextPart2209031.GsvdqVs2C1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJNd/zVAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBXdkP/3RO0ZGahh7/GEhYJbfqTobj jcv/QsUA6/sSu2UgaBB6NkeoBhS4BLW7tMnm6x3OYD28A6g7yxzYbNx7vRMvd+BI ZWO8JTOvEJdyYtK2PhSrA5UoFwV/4hTNkeSThvgMtRZ4rH8dWw2I9lBwZ/ugHTBZ N6aS8FrLnBYDptEatY7PZ8zJW3fGurgMzkcEkO6WmKJmfYnzB+8WXA4txL+N7Kph YCbjL/JdGBmRRhBVT10smAwxt3qeu51PayquEbXNEqd18eCn8guFirtEd4pMoJWK M6MREIo9d0q/ylTLSwPDdZfSA07FZ43OkyncGG6uJzFLU1l6MagIBceGl3a3SZKf LjjZXw9NHKFtQoqykTdq8L6svqcYdyS1KMvUzJzY1jtVakLoDIK9vhgnslICfVNq OEsxWqw03LHC7yqHnTWTxNhReK2iX6z98HB1JGScUwKGasuWzGsCCknzvxoSkJCA 8mVu4cMEOPpm0vZL0hXrmuGopMctl5kAGGxch4UcgK+H9PIlFszR6jSc24eAYYFf s2q3QxE3/dKGDgRRbAAZBx/8TX843XjNAlksf8BHgPqjbhkGoIwBpkJFRGdDzaG+ Uu/JTdL9cx9LV7E/dFmKjqRMHgu4/lPrHODEKn5atxSxPygPRNdMoawM+C0Mcno5 J9K+I/zWnO0hU7BvoR/x =9srB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2209031.GsvdqVs2C1--