From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Pwise-0007sZ-OD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:26:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 943AE1C074; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAF91C06A for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CBF1B4064 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:25:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:25:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <4D7410E3.3070708@gentoo.org> <1299528385.26337.22.camel@TesterTop4> <20110307213255.GK4530@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20110307213255.GK4530@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9658172.pckISeoEBZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201103071725.03081.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c06dda6030eefdbb2956a72174410dda --nextPart9658172.pckISeoEBZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:32:55 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > > Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo > > infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for > > the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow or slower than non-SSL. >=20 > but the certificate security click-through-couple-of-times before you > can access bugzilla is sort of annoying i heard rumors the cacert is finally going into firefox ... > As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to > view a bugtracker. if we're only forcing *login*, then this isnt an issue =2Dmike --nextPart9658172.pckISeoEBZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJNdVs/AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBod4QAK6LXJxe5R+b88BDvBzc82R1 INhnk7zBLahayJSYkav6ocypNcDoeDmavJJt3jY6HF3rLfE7jeXOvD1vn7CeuJcR TkNsahPHZev5eSJHhOIhYiRBXuH2aJXTB3KcJBJUXtJkrVy0LZQrznP3DvVElBYh EJc4GTDw0tU9VVySpaOYvSKV6LXPqjX/wZuUONZG1N8qSNyPwEg3RGP24GUGXpKV xu7s27Ixwb2UYM7ilxc+brFZEKKJOQKBwa4n+98PBWNLcgHjcBNpTJwbLjtHsQ9B 4FV9heRYnv5lztVuZe0UemxMsgOTXtKlMOd1uR1IGasNuGz6aBLeClGbTdr0EJP9 HZMAS1oREnxFP2uRZhymVKT+8kedcHURGtpnTjBCJDdIraGJGD2Jm7xoCVDoSb3y EtLxANNpFB3RtUgeWkKjKJIvkGC+EKYNpB7UiAFDHCh6QDy+WJCeopRznAsZ6cKQ P+3hqRFZoaqNu09Yx1NVhVBKQTenT0JXq4u6yXP6SOiKFsnUmaLSLLFr0qmmrq7l eNmZ2tw2BQPEvftwTRYVo/Ziz0KMHYYpRY1rJkeXfm/V4bcMUEutpO0FxJreVR4T fphAeSIKiq4DCj8GMDhi/VTkx7Mj0K1j4raS63jd2erDb/ZlBoNcfE+ztRQvgUug oL/FF3w8J59LC4q7Ychr =nJ8I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9658172.pckISeoEBZ--