From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44600-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1PswOR-0001tI-4G
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:03:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 908D7E02CB
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:03:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail1.deploylinux.net (mail1.deploylinux.net [209.216.192.150])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B89D1C007
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:08:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail1.deploylinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50C426CFFC;
	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:08:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at deploylinux.net
Received: from mail1.deploylinux.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail1.deploylinux.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id YWD4VL632RQ9; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hyperion.deploylinux.net (hyperion.deploylinux.net [66.93.35.200])
	by mail1.deploylinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF8AB26CFEC;
	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:08:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Marlowe <matt@deploylinux.net>
Organization: DeployLinux Consulting, Inc
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:08:20 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-gentoo-r7a; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
References: <4D501BA4.6040802@gentoo.org> <20110221001106.GB22774@nibiru.local> <4D678390.7050109@wildgooses.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D678390.7050109@wildgooses.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201102250308.21246.matt@deploylinux.net>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 9928c97d2866b85f804ee20eb588976d

All,

> Perhaps this is an argument for a git based portage tree?  Master can
> stay as the current status quo and anyone who wants to can maintain a
> branch or fork which points to a slightly different subset of the tree?
> 

I'm starting to put together a portage/stable server configuration for a large 
number of gentoo VM's that will eventually be hosted on a VMware ESX 4.1U1 
cluster - with the goal of limiting major changes to once/year and otherwise 
only applying security/minimum necessary updates.  I doubt it will be easy but 
I'm doing my best at it :)

As part of that I'm maintaining on github several related repositories, 
including portage mask/use/config files, cluster management utilities, etc.

     https://github.com/deploylinux

I've also started to document work on my blog:

     http://www.deploylinux.net/matt

I'm not currently planning to utilize a separate overlay for packages/ebuilds, 
but it's not out of the question.

I'd be happy to work with any other devs w/ similiar interests or production 
networks to manage.....github makes group development relatively easy.

MattM
-- 
Matthew Marlowe    /  858-400-7430  /    DeployLinux Consulting, Inc
  Professional Linux Hosting and Systems Administration Services
              www.deploylinux.net   *   matt@deploylinux.net
                             'MattM' @ irc.freenode.net