From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Pohl2-0001lw-4x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:37:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43D48E0BD0; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75030E0BF0 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3964780wwi.10 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:36:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=ycv8WL++M6DT0V6A2fCtPxEY4l40gaNWM7AQQh2Xwc0=; b=J5NFOgmFuFeAIix7dtDCy7WeBP3Qo/tqkHcDeJjoMKuNgJZN+jlzcwh+fVv10v/hhP 0RbEOl0gQan2qLMotLvwwlL5aCiPQgUAa8pW2FSZSXQKPDxZZjk4cQesNF33PrCtxbYr HKOjtyWI+ciSIe8CQvlWOm8drVxBg9Co7ZoZs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=FkFFdH1gIshIOnv5APRKxUHFVEOE8Ox7CmgR5mpSvVJU+MqbpRVLIm/dpScbt8XbSZ MW6b8YUnO7uG6O2vdPxl5lKqttG3JGbRFJQxdwS37Rc9Qp43arTcUlzDJVoRKkQyOazU +G/B5yXfEG0YnHrTDVG1bo9gMqR4aee2Jxn6M= Received: by 10.227.152.131 with SMTP id g3mr1532693wbw.107.1297625800482; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y29sm1308431wbd.10.2011.02.13.11.36.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:36:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:34:40 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item Message-ID: <20110213193440.475debea@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <1297625483.7535.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1297616621.21312.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110213170905.569595d6@googlemail.com> <1297625483.7535.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/c4v_KjCL7rwasnhTfFHKyzx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: bd42eee92add8d2b789ba1911748eb3f --Sig_/c4v_KjCL7rwasnhTfFHKyzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:31:23 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to > default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS > is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS=3D"*" > shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually > add all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view) Why not specify all the CAMERAS you know about as being on by default in the profile? Users who care enough can override this with an explicit subset. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/c4v_KjCL7rwasnhTfFHKyzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk1YMlMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFW0ACdFvmrkuYwceT8jbNpYO2QJoP3 uZoAn0nhePcvZM66+7zDR4R34w88IrcS =E3V1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/c4v_KjCL7rwasnhTfFHKyzx--