From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PnGAF-0006KE-Ab for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:57:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15139E09F2; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93013E0912 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (mayo-nat4.mayo.edu [129.176.197.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D17B1B411D for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:57:24 -0600 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] avoiding urgent stabilizations Message-ID: <20110209195724.GC24081@comet.mayo.edu> References: <20110207205059.GA10939@bookie> <20110208164116.GC31166@comet.mayo.edu> <201102081846.32733.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20110208175720.GE4530@gentoo.org> <4D529FC2.4060507@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: aa7e6b60290f413307481e456b0430e2 --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10:26 Wed 09 Feb , Rich Freeman wrote: > I have heard similar complaints about GLSAmaker. I half-wonder if it=20 > would make more sense to just edit the xml files directly and validate=20 > them with a tool, and send out an email, if the tool really is that=20 > bad. If this is really the problem, please propose a GSoC project: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2011_ideas Sure, it's a ways off, so maybe we'd need an interim workaround. But at=20 least we'd be likely to end up with a fix in the end, and more GSoC=20 ideas are always welcome (we had 19 students last year!). --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.com --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1S8aQACgkQXVaO67S1rtu/vgCeN3SkIBPYJ+Z6ZpAKOfMJMUDR HWoAoK77p5AnTVTWXu3fCiiGIl/ttJvF =s5Ho -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--