From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PANVG-0004YP-1b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:54:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33BC7E07BB; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82816E07B7 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EE251B40F6 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:54:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Extending EAPI="4" Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:56:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-tuxonice-r8-AFTA; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201010251524.24984.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20101025144200.5d98da39@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20101025144200.5d98da39@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3183405.UkyPgTtiCC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010251556.19670.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ac22efe3-79eb-4a18-8346-a95b0e9a039d X-Archives-Hash: 44db004c30dd5aadce1bc68483805412 --nextPart3183405.UkyPgTtiCC Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010-10-25 15:42:00 Ciaran McCreesh napisa=C5=82(a): > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:24:23 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 1. Support for "." characters in names of USE flags >=20 > If you do this, you'll have to either convert everything using Python > ABIs to EAPI 4 immediately, or have two sets of flag names. Won't users > get confused if they have to set both python_abis_3_2 (for EAPI < 4 > packages) and python_abis_3.2 (for EAPI 4 packages)? There won't be any such USE flags for EAPI <4. I'm planning to use e.g. REQ= UIRED_USE, which isn't available in EAPI <4. > And won't developers have a hard time getting [use] deps right for them? Appropriate dependencies will be automatically generated by python.eclass. =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart3183405.UkyPgTtiCC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMxYyDAAoJEFU3/w1zlLfgDzQQAKo0Q0ZbvQ4kP8a9PzdpHcyW 1XdzOoN1okLDWXFrzHIrFVhAk5RgjMIhmIzwJWt88CjumdTDgFZF69DQ5VT1dWg+ JE/yGHT+C5YjrokO+ibZqubQOb+vs+3zWC9DqX6C5rjBtKKzELyAr8O/tuGLSy4l GrOS5Kzzb/tp0FvsnAQK8BheM3aP4Z7glwLzviQV5o2jixqVugEtxX8T2xaQD4Bb Yoc6mg2COjleQnRUj/iuPQy61O7kHTy69kolv51k4HMkI/krwI2THMHWTXmi6mkl W/9dJ4gVNaZMLTiAFm51rKvAFmzav31VKXVGk6TdcN5c/dEJIqLmAQMePg3TOWFD 20DKchnTbp0SlwrmMDKFE57c/NtLpPx5DhElCLLA5TonWHmKM4xGlSdnEbxPU/EH xeYxXEIpRSK6xTYX7cZ3AJ1ZtuIgYtyNQGDcV6WTkpAi515S4WDD3yXKqPwoEtRS 88Dzl85bCkjN0TsRNZNPQwAR/K1WefvPRSzdWSSlizE+ghySLR2/RW64Zn/Y0rqd 6p3LdinjybtS+tiIzjQCL53CfnfdADlsAZ1CwDc94Dg9FX3SA0EfMeNMl7yYF2iw 9JVNBnOOkZHAYGzUHTRFdEzMxoFpUpR8kyYlBpGehlmd2X6Ke7D1lrohpjDwZsOs p0FROI6u3X2lcl/Lv9B2 =fY3M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3183405.UkyPgTtiCC--