From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PANfD-0005uU-0O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:04:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C516DE0768; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CD8E0682 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so1844448ewy.40 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:04:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=P6woaPE2R/UigDrwbfJdgRo21R1DF2OZBQW4eTYkmd8=; b=DScjmNONV2b4mZcvzzzhChGOu4VypXN8A+nks3i1oDUhN3+2OUuBo04d0Jjg0NhFUb eeXzvrA7GepEx/kQlr0b5XK+t0t1B3YKc5vAZRrlmFjn4PrG+Pil6mX8bbGt+u73bVvt AUQwH5mrAqBIGJ+38zqG4FBWFeKOBgH64ymKQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=caD8qGK7alODf32l9GoGi7RJh4mwymmh/2+SrZdHpuEbbftCq9MqNsedDOiROajJ0b ZL4G1p94iPnRegHRtJjAGiF5kCXH8OqPrxAmq5HxICFbYxvzif0PmSX0pjOWEs1KwQ05 BQ9kAizzEr3bvvv/SoIlNncHxGDyDwfSYZSDU= Received: by 10.216.191.215 with SMTP id g65mr416153wen.16.1288015444816; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone (cpc1-broo3-0-0-cust98.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com [86.4.208.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x59sm4199379weq.38.2010.10.25.07.04.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:03:49 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Extending EAPI="4" Message-ID: <20101025150349.7e82e57e@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <19653.36002.269847.158565@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <201010251524.24984.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <19653.36002.269847.158565@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/oN9j/AbWO5J6gMv66NZo6Ha"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 876f174a-ef99-4959-b450-624c76896bb6 X-Archives-Hash: 1e5ca575a34f2a542bfb959c8ffe70c8 --Sig_/oN9j/AbWO5J6gMv66NZo6Ha Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:56:50 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 1. Support for "." characters in names of USE flags >=20 > Are you aware that this would break existing programs that do regexp > matching on USE flags? The current implementation of the useq() > function in portage is probably the most prominent example. That's already a can of worms, since @ is allowed in use flag names. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/oN9j/AbWO5J6gMv66NZo6Ha Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzFjlAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFJFACgrzNKj2H8VoZsRvsI8G4rM6Us Q2EAoLd4NT0um+LavimO80nJnutReIsL =TVQm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oN9j/AbWO5J6gMv66NZo6Ha--